Skip to content
#federated learning Dataset Open access

Replication package for Flows and Rounds: benchmark and retrieval scripts for distributed neurodynamic optimization and federated learning

Sep 2026 · Mendeley Data

Abstract

This package contains the code and generated data behind the quantitative results of the survey "Flows and Rounds: A Survey of Distributed Neurodynamic Optimization and Federated Learning", submitted to Neurocomputing. It reproduces every number, table, and figure in Sections 2.3 and 8 of the article. No third-party, proprietary, or personal data is involved: all data is synthetic and generated at run time from fixed random seeds, so the package is self-contained and deterministic. Two scripts are included. The first, toy_benchmark.py, runs a controlled experiment on a synthetic distributed optimization problem with five nodes, twenty dimensions, and a closed-form optimum, averaged over ten seeds. It measures two things. Experiment one measures consensus drift as a function of the number of local steps per communication round, holding total local work fixed, and tests the prediction that drift grows with the dwell interval and vanishes when the agents hold identical objectives. Drift is found to be identically zero without gradient dissimilarity and to grow as E^0.88 and E^0.84 at the two heterogeneity levels tested. Experiment two measures whether an integral-enhanced flow, of the kind used in the zeroing neural network literature to reject persistent disturbance, also attenuates the Gaussian noise that a differential privacy mechanism deliberately injects. Both flows are driven by an identical noise stream and the noise response is isolated by differencing each noisy run against its own noise-free run. The integral term is found to remove steady-state bias almost entirely while leaving injected-noise energy unchanged, a ratio of 1.007. This second result contradicted the authors' expectation when the experiment was designed, and it is reported as measured. The second script, search_protocol.py, records a structured literature retrieval executed on 31 August 2026 and computes the deduplication and overlap counts reported in Section 2.3 of the article. It also emits a screening sheet listing all eighty-five retrieved records with their query provenance. The package is intended for readers who wish to verify the article's numerical claims, and for anyone extending the benchmark to other flows, noise models, or heterogeneity regimes. It requires only Python, NumPy, and Matplotlib.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.