Sep 2026· ACM Transactions on Spatial Algorithms and Systems· 29 references
Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) can be applied to various real-world tasks, many of which require spatial reasoning, like pattern-based spatial search, Point of Interest (POI) recommendation, and itinerary or travel planning. However, on their own LLMs have been shown to lack reliable spatial reasoning capabilities, especially about distances. Further, success at these tasks requires the LLM to have been exposed to the relevant places and to successfully disambiguate their spatial interpretations, which is affected by the popularity of the place name. To address these problems, we develop a novel approach using spatial Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) to enable an LLM to use relevant distance information not explicitly learned during training when answering spatial questions that involve distance reasoning. Our method encodes a spatial graph of geodesic and road network distances between cities and towns, as well as a mapping to their alternative names, and compares a variety of techniques to provide the LLM with the appropriate spatial context from those knowledge stores. By incorporating relevant spatial information, our method significantly outperforms the baseline LLM on several tasks requiring distance-based spatial reasoning, including nearest-neighbor questions and distance analogy questions. We further show through experiments which graph storage and retrieval methods perform best, and which are brittle when applied to more challenging questions. Given the vast array of possible places an LLM could be asked to reason about, our work offers a first step towards providing a rudimentary distance-oriented spatial ‘world model’ to complement the vast linguistic knowledge held in LLMs.
The results are packaged in the Greenfield Startup Model (GSM), which explains the priority of startups to release the product as quickly as possible, and the need to shorten time-to-market, by speeding up the development through low-precision engineering activities.
Carmine Giardino, Nicolò Paternoster, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al.· IEEE Transactions on Softwar...· 178 citations· ⚡14
Software startup companies develop innovative, software-intensive products within limited timeframes and with few resources, searching for sustainable and scalable business models.
M. Unterkalmsteiner, P. Abrahamsson, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· e-Informatica Software Engin...· 157 citations· ⚡17
This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.
Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al.· Empirical Software Engineeri...· 127 citations· ⚡15
The comparison of adopter and non-adopter sample reveals three potential adoption inhibitor, security, data privacy, and portability, which underlines the importance of the technical and security perspectives for research investigating the adoption of technology.
Nattakarn Phaphoom, Xiaofeng Wang, S. Samuel et al.· Journal of Systems and Softw...· 111 citations· ⚡8
The ongoing work building a Raspberry Pi cluster consisting of 300 nodes is presented, with potential use cases being an inexpensive and green test bed for cloud computing research and a robust and mobile data center for operating in adverse environments.
P. Abrahamsson, S. Helmer, Nattakarn Phaphoom et al.· IEEE International Conferenc...· 110 citations· ⚡7
The results indicate that software developers are a slightly happy population, but the need for limiting the unhappiness of developers remains, and 219 factors representing causes of unhappiness while developing software are identified.
D. Graziotin, Fabian Fagerholm, Xiaofeng Wang et al.· International Conference on...· 84 citations· ⚡6
Related blog posts
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduSep 14, 2026
The “HardFlow” algorithm could help generative AI models produce high-quality outputs that obey strict requirements when “pretty close” doesn’t cut it.
AI may appear weightless, but every model depends on physical infrastructure. To understand responsible AI, we need to look beyond algorithms and consider the entire lifecycle of the hardware behind them. The post Responsible AI Must Consider Its Afterlife appeared first on GPT-Lab.