This paper formalizes the structure of prompt-injection artifacts, enabling defenders, red teamers, and cyber threat intelligence (CTI) teams to label, compare, and mutate attacks without relying on fragile string matching.
Abstract
Four years after prompt injection was first identified in 2022, attacks are still predominantly documented as verbatim strings rather than structured exploits, despite advancing agent capabilities and threat actors embedding injections to subvert AI-assisted security analysis. This paper formalizes the structure of prompt-injection artifacts, enabling defenders, red teamers, and cyber threat intelligence (CTI) teams to label, compare, and mutate attacks without relying on fragile string matching. Because large language models compile varied natural-language realizations into identical executable actions, labeling must track attacker intent (tool targets, sinks, and effects) rather than surface wording. We propose a seven-component model (carrier, delivery vector, concealment, context-break, privilege escalation, payload, and return channel) consisting of five artifact fields and two environment fields. This framework unifies roles partially addressed by HOUYI's payload decomposition, the Promptware Kill Chain, and campaign taxonomies, while framing minimal jailbreak frameworks like ReNeLLM as projections onto a restricted subspace. We provide clear labeling rules, a logical analysis record mapping directly to industry CTI schemas, worked examples including EchoLeak (CVE-2025-32711) and an in-the-wild malware AI-evasion sample, and an illustrative agentic flowchart.
This work proposes Architectural Intent Collapse (AIC), a formal framework capturing the systematic loss of communicative intent when text from heterogeneous sources is flattened into a single context window, and introduces Intent Separation Degree (ISD) as a measurable metric.
Zhaowen Feng, Zhenhui Liu, Ming-Jun Ma et al.· Electronics· 0 citations
A systematic review and structured descriptive synthesis of research on defenses against prompt-based attacks in language model and agent systems reveals trade-offs between security effectiveness, performance, and system complexity as well as major gaps in benchmarks, indirect attack coverage, and multi-agent evaluatio...
Sana Mourad, E. E. Abdallah, Mohammad Ababneh· Electronics· 0 citations
: Large language models are increasingly being deployed in safety-critical domains, yet remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that circumvent safety alignments. This systematic review synthesizes empirical jailbreak research published between 2024 and 2025, using a PRISMA-guided search protocol, followed by BERTopic-b...
Meda Račaitytė, Hélder Bastos, R. Ribeiro et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
A four-layer taxonomy mapping 13 vulnerability types across perception, brain, action, and interaction layers is contributed, and seven open problems centered on containment are identified.
Md Jafrin Hossain, Mohammad Arif Hossain, Nirwan Ansari· 0 citations
Current safety guard models for Large Language Models (LLMs) often fail to block complex Jailbreaking attacks because they focus on the structure of a prompt rather than its true intent. To evaluate this problem, we introduce the Role-Goal-Format (RGF) framework, which analyzes how the combination of a user’s persona,...
Jin-Seong Kim, Han-Ju Lee, Hyeon-Jin Jeong et al.· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Puppet is developed, the first automated security evaluation framework that enriches benign tool descriptions through selective requirement engineering to maximize semantic expressiveness, restructures them into LLM-preferred formats using description schema transformation, and applies name prioritization to introduce...
Zhiyuan Li, Jingzheng Wu, Yuhao Peng et al.· ACM Transactions on Software...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.