This work introduces Mycelium, an active shared workspace that automatically connects researchers and AI agents, and describes networked intelligence as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts.
Abstract
Most AI-for-science systems focus on scaling a single reasoning process by using better models, larger context windows, long-horizon agentic execution, or digital co-scientists working with one principal user. However, challenging scientific problems are rarely solved by one reasoner alone. They are solved by teams whose members carry different priors, experimental background, tacit knowledge, and domain-trained intuitions. The open problem is therefore not only how to scale models, but how to develop"networked intelligence", scaling the connections between humans and AI systems so that a result or hypothesis produced in one context reaches another person, agent, instrument or robot that can act on it. We introduce Mycelium, an active shared workspace that automatically connects researchers and AI agents. As human users and agents work, the system captures important observations and hypotheses, tracks how they relate to the team's evolving knowledge model, and routes them to the person or agent whose next decision they can inform. We evaluate Mycelium through a real-world scientific discovery use case: a biological multi-omics campaign where shared context turned a local analytical finding into a cross-expert mechanistic constraint and ultimately into an experimental design. Finally, we describe networked intelligence as sparse conditional computation over distributed scientific contexts. This framework establishes when a scaled standalone agent is sufficient, and when isolated data and specialized expertise make a networked approach essential.
This work argues that studying AI Scientists as human-agent systems (HAS) is both underexplored and undervalued, and calls for new research that adopts the HAS lens to develop mathematical frameworks for understanding and fostering human-AI synergy in scientific discovery.
P. Emami, Sameera Horawalavithana, T. Nguyễn et al.· 0 citations
Large language models and foundation models are increasingly embedded in reasoning systems that plan, invoke tools, use memory, gather evidence, and iteratively refine their outputs. The second KDD Day on AI Reasoning brings together researchers and practitioners from academia and industry to examine how these systems...
Jun Huan, James Caverlee, Lei Li et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This article examines the emerging paradigm of agentic AI for scientific discovery, traces the conceptual shift from tools to agents, lays out a six-stage workflow spanning literature synthesis to manuscript generation, and reviews practical systems in chemistry, equation discovery, materials science, and general machi...
Alexander Taktakidze· Longevity Horizon· 1 citation
This perspectives paper introduces the Collaborative Information Retrieval Configurations (CIRC) framework, organized around three dimensions -- composition, coordination, and adaptation -- that provide systematic guidance for designing and evaluating human-agent teams in IR.
Chirag Shah, L. Tamine, Mouly Dewan· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This work presents AgentPanel, a multi-agent forum for human--AI collaboration in scientific exploration, a multi-agent forum for human--AI collaboration in scientific exploration that outperforms a centralized multi-agent debate baseline and shows that users value AgentPanel for perspective diversity and exploration s...
Zhi-Yao Cui, Qianyi Wang, Hao Yan et al.· 1 citation
Large language models (LLMs) and agentic AI systems are rapidly moving into user-facing applications, yet most remain fundamentally generic, optimized for population-level objectives under the assumption that one model can serve all users. This assumption is increasingly misaligned with real-world deployment, where AI...
Xiaoyan Zhao, Yang Zhang, Moxin Li et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.