Skip to content
Review Open access

Generative Artificial Intelligence for Automated Scientific Literature Analysis: A Review

Jul 2026 · International Journal of Computer Science & Information System · Vol 11, pp. 25-42 · 0 citations

TL;DR

The findings suggest that future literature analysis platforms will increasingly integrate Generative AI with retrieval systems, human-in-the-loop verification, autonomous research agents, and standardized governance frameworks to produce trustworthy, scalable, and transparent scientific intelligence.

Abstract

The rapid expansion of scientific publications across disciplines has made traditional literature review methodologies increasingly difficult to execute efficiently. Researchers must analyze thousands of articles, identify emerging trends, synthesize evidence, detect research gaps, and evaluate methodological quality within limited timeframes. Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI), powered by large language models, transformer architectures, retrieval-augmented generation, and intelligent knowledge representation techniques, has emerged as a transformative solution for automated scientific literature analysis. Unlike conventional text mining approaches that primarily perform keyword matching or statistical extraction, Generative AI demonstrates contextual understanding, semantic reasoning, automated summarization, question answering, citation synthesis, hypothesis generation, and research trend identification. These capabilities significantly improve the efficiency, scalability, and quality of scientific knowledge management while reducing researcher workload. This review systematically examines recent developments in Generative AI for automated scientific literature analysis by synthesizing evidence from the provided contemporary literature covering artificial intelligence, workflow automation, cloud intelligence, cybersecurity, financial AI, process mining, enterprise automation, reinforcement learning, digital transformation, and intelligent computing infrastructures. The review develops a comprehensive analytical framework describing the complete literature-analysis pipeline, including literature acquisition, document preprocessing, semantic embedding, knowledge extraction, contextual reasoning, automated synthesis, evidence validation, and research recommendation generation. Furthermore, the study critically evaluates technological enablers such as transformer-based architectures, cloud-edge computing infrastructures, retrieval-augmented generation, agentic AI, workflow automation, and scalable enterprise AI systems that collectively support intelligent literature analysis (Krishnan & Bhat, 2025; Kumar, 2025; Venkiteela, 2026). The review identifies significant opportunities in accelerating systematic reviews, improving interdisciplinary knowledge discovery, reducing information overload, supporting evidence-based decision making, and enabling continuous scientific monitoring. Simultaneously, important challenges remain concerning hallucination, citation reliability, explainability, reproducibility, privacy, governance, computational scalability, and ethical deployment. The findings suggest that future literature analysis platforms will increasingly integrate Generative AI with retrieval systems, human-in-the-loop verification, autonomous research agents, and standardized governance frameworks to produce trustworthy, scalable, and transparent scientific intelligence. This review contributes a structured conceptual framework that integrates recent advances in Generative AI with automated scientific literature analysis while identifying future research opportunities for developing reliable AI-assisted scientific discovery ecosystems.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2025

Large Language Models for Intelligent Research Knowledge Discovery and Automation

This study presents a conceptual framework that combines semantic retrieval, intelligent reasoning, automated literature analysis, and workflow orchestration, demonstrating how LLM-powered systems can transform scientific research into scalable, accurate, ethical, and collaborative knowledge discovery processes.

Narendra Karmarkar, Iyengar P. K. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Global Research Trends in Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Bibliometric Analysis

A comprehensive bibliometric analysis of global generative AI research to characterize its publication growth, disciplinary and geographical distribution, institutional participation, funding patterns, citation performance, and thematic development provides an evidence-based, multidimensional characterization of the ra...

Sofia Stamou, Matina Kiourexidou · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Automated Research Gap Detection in Scientific Literature: A Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing Approach

An automated research gap detection system that integrates natural language processing, citation network analysis, and ensemble machine learning to identify research gaps across scientific literature systematically is presented.

Adesh V. Patil, Somanath J. Salunkhe · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Generative Artificial Intelligence Applications in Developing Research Support Services at Academic Libraries

This study provides a scientific foundation for directing RSS development at academic libraries in the GenAI context, and indicates rapidly increasing publication output, particularly from 2023 onward, reflecting growing interest from the academic community.

Nhat Truong Phan, Hong Sinh Nguyen · 0 citations
Review Open access Jul 2026

Charting the Evolution of Generative Artificial Intelligence: Insights from A Systematic Literature Review

This review highlights the field's strong interdisciplinary character and reveals the current challenges that the sector faces, and outlines a systematic research program to guide further studies of the implementation, impact, and problems of GenAI in enterprises and communities.

Majdouline Attaoui, Wissal Attaoui, Anas Moukrim et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Research in the Age of AI – How to Plan? A Bibliometric Exploration of the Research Lifecycle

A five-phase framework comprising Strategic Conceptualisation, Systematic Literature Synthesis, Methodology Selection, Governance, Ethics and Trust, and Continuous Reflection and Feedback is proposed, positioning the human touch, curiosity, critical thinking, critical thinking, creativity, contextual expertise, and eth...

Niranjan Devkota, M. Siddique, Dipendra Karki et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.