Skip to content
Open access

Advanced Fraud Detection Using ML

Jun 2026 · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · Vol 14, pp. 2806-2810 · 0 citations

TL;DR

FraudX is presented, an end-to-end explainable fraud detection framework that combines supervised learning with rule-based categorization and human-readable explanations and demonstrates how operational thresholding, featureimportance-driven explanations, and analyst-oriented visualization can be integrated into a practical fraud triage workflow suitable for academic demonstration and prototype deployment.

Abstract

Financial fraud causes significant economic loss and erodes trust in digital payment ecosystems. Traditional rule-only systems struggle with evolving attack patterns, while pure black-box machine learning models are difficult for analysts to interpret during investigations. This paper presents **FraudX**, an end-to-end explainable fraud detection framework that combines supervised learning with rule-based categorization and human-readable explanations. The system generates a labeled synthetic transaction dataset of 10,000 records with 20+ behavioral and contextual features, trains a Random Forest classifier with standardized preprocessing, and deploys inference through an interactive Streamlit dashboard. For each transaction, FraudX outputs a probability-based *Suspicion Score*, a threshold-controlled suspicious flag, a prioritized *Fraud_Type* label, and concise *Suspicion_Reasons*. Experimental evaluation on held-out synthetic test data reports 95.2% accuracy, 94.8% precision, 93.5% recall, and 94.1% F1-score. The proposed architecture demonstrates how operational thresholding, featureimportance-driven explanations, and analyst-oriented visualization can be integrated into a practical fraud triage workflow suitable for academic demonstration and prototype deployment.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Explainable Ai-Based Fraud Detection in Fintech Applications

This study proposes an Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)-based fraud detection framework for FinTech transactions using the Kaggle Credit Card Fraud Detection dataset containing 284,807 transactions, including 492 fraudulent cases.

D. Aina, J. A. Ayeni, A. Ogunjobi et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

FraudXAI-Net: An Explainability-Driven Intelligent Fraud Detection Framework

The proposed FraudXAI-Net framework can help financial institutions build more reliable, transparent, and intelligent fraud detection systems and improves both fraud detection performance and model interpretability.

Jakkula Jayanthi · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Credit Card Fraud Detection using Machine Learning on IEEE-CIS Dataset

Credit card fraud detection is widely recognized as a critical issue in digital financial systems due to the rapid growth of online transactions. However, existing approaches often fail to provide a comprehensive comparative framework and show limited effectiveness under highly imbalanced conditions. In this context, t...

Vansh Jain, Harish Sharma, Narendra Khatri · 0 citations
Open access 2023

Reducing Financial Fraud Using Machine Learning and CRM Data Models

The fact that banks may find fraud, minimize risks before they happen, and make their clients happy by combining ML and CRM standard data models together in an effective manner is demonstrated.

Satyendra Kumar Vanapalli · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Performance Analysis of a Scalable Machine Learning Model for Financial Fraud Detection

In this paper, a forensic end-to-end machine learning pipeline to detect financial fraud in PaySim synthetic mobile money dataset a corpus of 6,362,620 transactions with an extreme class imbalance ratio of 0.129% is presented. Proposed system is based on the distributed MLlib framework of Apache Spark in order to overc...

Anuran Baruah, Sahithya Sambhrama, K. S · 0 citations
Conference Jul 2026

Unsupervised Fraud Detection Under Extreme Class Imbalance: A Comparative Study

Credit card fraud detection is challenging due to extreme class imbalance in transaction data and the evolving nature of fraudulent behavior, which causes traditional supervised classifiers to favor legitimate transactions and report misleadingly high accuracy. This paper presents a comparative study of four unsupervis...

Anshula Sharma, Duy H. Ho · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.