2026· Journal of Edugeography· Vol 7, pp. 331-345· 0 citations
TL;DR
An autoethnographic experiment was described in which three authors used AI to mimic their writing voices and to compare their unassisted responses to a research question about the nature and meaning of autoethnographic writing, revealing startling insights about the nature of writing identity and the human search for meaning in the age of AI.
Abstract
Although AI is most often framed as a cognitive tool, its social and psychological effects are arguably much more profound. AI has far-reaching implications for human experience on an emotive, embodied level; it is not simply another technical innovation, since its rapid evolution will likely change our deepest, most cherished beliefs about what it means to be human and how we see ourselves, collectively and individually. It raises unique challenges for those who are invested in forms of creative expression, especially deeply personal, intimate, and introspective writing. Accordingly, this essay describes an autoethnographic experiment in which three authors used AI to mimic their writing voices and to compare their unassisted responses to a research question about the nature and meaning of autoethnographic writing. Results revealed startling insights about the nature of writing identity and the human search for meaning in the age of AI, causing the authors to question just what makes us quintessentially human anyway.
In a world of deepfakes, generative AI, and ongoing debates over cultural appropriation, questions about what makes art “authentic” are newly urgent. We build on work from science and the humanities to offer a unified psychological account of perceived
art authenticity
. Across six studies, we find that people see...
Danica Dillion, Neil Hester, Yochanan E. Bigman et al.· Empirical Studies of the Art...· 0 citations
The work argues that autoethnography functions not merely as a qualitative method but as a phenomenological mode of being and knowing that safeguards the primacy of anthropic subjectivity against machinic imitation.
An autoethnographic account of AI as a reflective companion rather than a therapeutic or authoritative agent is offered, highlighting how women, particularly those balancing motherhood and academic identities, may use AI-mediated dialogue to surface emotional labour and renegotiate their sense of self.
N. A. Zulkifly· Qualitative Research Journal· 0 citations
A procedure for AI‐stimulated reflexive practice in language teacher education research, alongside a critical engagement with the ethical, environmental, and epistemic costs such practice entails is proposed.
This paper investigates a Chinese New Zealander, immigrant, and arts-based researcher’s evolving sense of belonging through autoethnography and arts-based inquiry. Building on insights from the author’s previous critical autoethnographic studies of identity transformation, this work seeks to communicate complex experie...
It is argued that AI-driven “style replication” is fundamentally a negotiation of social relations, one that recentres platform power and reorganises the conditions of human-AI collaboration.
Meng Liang, Fang-Zhou Zhang· Media, Culture & Society· 3 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.