Jul 2026· Ngenani: The Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti Journal of Community Engagement and Societal Transformations· 0 citations
TL;DR
This qualitative interpretive case study investigates how AI guidance influences adolescents’ identity formation in relation to Ubuntu values and proposes the Ubuntu-AI Harmonization Model (UAHM), a framework designed to guide the ethical integration of AI in education while upholding indigenous value systems.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are reshaping education globally, sparking intense debate within Zimbabwean higher learning institutions where the Ubuntu philosophy — rooted in ethics, community, and integrity — remains central. Zimbabwe’s higher education system, guided by the five pillars of Education 5.0 (teaching, research, community engagement, innovation, and industrialisation), encourages technological progress. However, many universities strictly prohibit AI use in assignments and dissertations, often equating it to plagiarism and relying on tools such as Turnitin to detect AI-generated content. Meanwhile, adolescents increasingly embrace AI as a legitimate tool to simplify academic work and engage with the digital age. Some innovate by using AI humanisers to evade detection, thereby challenging traditional academic practices that privilege books and libraries over digital tools. This qualitative interpretive case study investigates how AI guidance influences adolescents’ identity formation in relation to Ubuntu values, drawing on interviews with three lecturers and three student focus groups. Thematic analysis reveals tensions between institutional resistance to AI and students’ drive for technological integration. Adolescents’ identities emerge through efforts to balance communal ethics with digital autonomy, as they advocate for modernised educational approaches. The study contributes to the body of knowledge by proposing the Ubuntu-AI Harmonization Model (UAHM), a framework designed to guide the ethical integration of AI in education while upholding indigenous value systems. The findings offer practical insights for educators, policymakers, and AI developers on fostering culturally grounded, technology-enabled learning environments.
Decades of research critique science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education for maintaining inequalities through its learning content and culture. The notion of (science) identity has increasingly been used to approach this research, understanding and critiquing how the learning content and cultur...
Anne-Kathrin Peters, S. Bengtsson· Cultural Studies of Science...· 0 citations
It is argued that AI-related integrity disputes are better understood as conflicts between competing values than as individual moral failings, and implications for policy design, assessment reform, and faculty development are discussed.
M. Grobler· Proceedings of the Internati...· 0 citations
Tunisian higher education is operating in something close to a policy vacuum on AI-assisted writing, and it is essential to formulate codes of ethics that incorporate the notion of so-called AI literacy into the educational process of teaching research methods and academic writing.
Mongi Aloui· Review of Artificial Intelli...· 0 citations
Stefan Popenici argues that universities are living through a ‘psychotic episode’: a break with reality that leaves them cheering for technologies designed by financial elites and funded by the military.
Stefan A. D. Popenici, Jürgen Rudolph, F. Tang et al.· Journal of Applied Learning...· 0 citations
This paper focuses on youth multimodal composition as a form of AI literacy pedagogy, analyzing the video products and written reflections of 22 11th grade students who composed video public service announcements about AI ethics issues of their choosing.
Sarah K. Burriss, Blaine E. Smith, Hanna Ziegler et al.· Journal of Adolescent &...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.