It is indicated that although many methods report strong performance on standard benchmarks, their effectiveness is often influenced by dataset bias and limited evaluation settings, and most methods exhibit reduced performance in cold-start scenarios, highlighting challenges in generalization.
Abstract
Computational approaches to drug discovery involve multiple sub-problems, and among them, drug-target binding affinity prediction plays an important role. Despite recent advances, accurately predicting binding affinity remains an open research area. The major objective of our paper is to perform a comprehensive review and comparative analysis of recent machine learning methods for drug-target binding affinity prediction, with a focus on identifying strengths, limitations, and research gaps. We review representative recent deep learning approaches that use common benchmark datasets and evaluation metrics, covering a range of neural network architectures and representation strategies. In addition, we analyze seven widely used benchmark datasets and commonly adopted evaluation metrics for drug-target binding affinity prediction. Our analysis indicates that although many methods report strong performance on standard benchmarks, their effectiveness is often influenced by dataset bias and limited evaluation settings. Furthermore, most methods exhibit reduced performance in cold-start scenarios, highlighting challenges in generalization. We identify several limitations of current approaches, including dataset imbalance, the lack of standardized evaluation, limited real-world applicability, and challenges in cold-start scenarios. We also discuss future research directions, including better dataset design, more robust evaluation methods, improved handling of cold-start problems, and the integration of multimodal representations.
In the early stages of drug discovery, predicting drug-target affinity is a crucial task. Due to the vast scale of genomic and chemical spaces, traditional biological methods are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and resource-demanding. As a result, machine learning-based computational methods have emerged to narrow dow...
Naihan Shi, Yanpeng Zhao, Wanying Li et al.· 2026 IEEE 27th China Confere...· 0 citations
Accurately predicting binding affinities between drugs and targets is crucial for drug discovery but remains challenging due to the complexity of modeling interactions between small drug and large targets. This research presents Dual modality feature fused-drug target affinity (DMFF-DTA), a model for drug-target affini...
Ghazala Sultan, J. Vincent, Ratna Sahaya et al.· International Conference Com...· 0 citations
EQTri-DTI is designed to integrate three modality-specific networks to encode 1D protein sequences, 2D molecular images, and 3D drug structures and develops a joint uncertainty quantification scheme by calculating the weight summation of evidential uncertainty and prediction entropy from the aforementioned output, enab...
This study shows that incorporating synthetic molecular dynamics data improves deep learning models for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction beyond static experimental structures, and highlights that dynamic synthetic datasets can enable deep learning models to outperform conventional methods such as MM-PBSA whil...
P. Agrawal, Prathit Chatterjee, U. Priyakumar· Journal of Cheminformatics· 0 citations
This scoping review investigates the current state of PK property prediction of small molecules in drug discovery using machine learning methods and a combination of machine learning and mechanistic models and proposes leveraging the pattern recognition capabilities of deep learning models in conjunction with the biolo...
Lucille Tomin, Vida Bodaghi-Namileh, D. G. Schwartz et al.· Journal of Chemical Informat...· 0 citations
SimSiam‐MuTF is introduced, a novel fine‐tuning framework to enhance the detection of resistance variants by explicitly aligning latent embedding distances with the corresponding shifts in binding affinity between WT and MT targets, which deepen the understanding of mutation‐induced resistance.
Xiaowen Hu, Pan Zhang, Shangqian Wu et al.· Advancement of science· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.