Back to #artificial intelligence
#artificial intelligence Preprint Open access

Global Index on Responsible AI 2026 : Conceptual Framework and Methodology

Fola Adeleke Rachel Adams Ayantola Alayande Daniela Benavente Ana Florido Nicol\'as Grossman Leah Junck
Aug 2026
Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

This report presents the methodology of the Global Index on Responsible AI (GIRAI), 2nd Edition. This edition refines the 1st Edition by strengthening the distinction between framework existence and implementation, restructuring dimensions from three to five thematic areas, introducing more granular variables for framework quality, and applying a multi-stage review and validation process. An independent statistical pre-audit was conducted to assess the coherence and robustness of the framework. GIRAI assesses responsible AI governance across five dimensions: Inclusion and Diversity, Ethics and Sustainability, Labour and Skills, Trust and Safety, and Use of AI in Public Service. Each dimension has a number of indicators (38 in total), organised into three pillars, namely AI Policy (17 indicators on government frameworks and implementation, assessed through primary data), CSO Engagement (5 indicators, primary data), and Enabling Conditions (15 indicators on the structural factors shaping responsible AI governance, assessed through secondary data), and a government Use of Unacceptable Risk AI (URAI) indicator (primary data), applied separately as an accountability penalty to the final score. Data was collected by 135 country-level researchers through a structured global survey, complemented by secondary datasets. The count, scope, enforceability, thematic coverage, and implementation levels of the data points are coded into numerical variables, normalised to a scale of 100, aggregated through pillar weights of 60% (AI policy), 10% (CSO Engagement), and 30% (Enabling conditions). A deduction penalty is applied for countries with evidence of URAI. This documentation enables systematic cross-national comparison, supporting policymakers, civil society, and AI developers to identify where commitments are translating into enforceable protections and where critical gaps remain.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Dec 2025

Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025

Investigating how experienced developers use agents in building software, including their motivations, strategies, task suitability, and sentiments finds that while experienced developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation out of insistence on fundamental software quality attributes.

Ruanqianqian Huang, Avery Reyna, Sorin Lerner et al. · 19 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Jan 2026

A systematic review of machine learning techniques to address diagnosis and treatment of autism: challenges and opportunities

This systematic review evaluates 55 studies from 2017 to 2023 on the application of machine learning techniques to ASD, highlighting key challenges and opportunities, particularly the need for models that can integrate complex data to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Rafael Muñoz-Terol, Jesús Peral, Sandra Amador et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1

Convergent Evolution: How Different Language Models Learn Similar Number Representations

This paper identifies two different routes through which models can acquire geometrically separable features: they can learn them from complementary co-occurrence signals in general language data, including text-number co-occurrence and cross-number interaction, or from multi-token addition problems.

Deqing Fu, Tianyi Zhou, Mikhail Belkin et al. · 3 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2025

TabularQGAN: a quantum generative model for tabular data synthesis

A novel quantum generative model for synthesizing tabular data by proposing a quantum generative adversarial network architecture with flexible data encoding and a novel quantum circuit ansatz for effectively modeling tabular data is introduced.

P. Bhardwaj, Caitlin Jones, Lasse Dierich et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Jun 2026

Self-Evolving Agents as Dynamic Graph Transformation: A Survey and New Perspective

This survey model agent state as a dynamic graph, where memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter-agent relations are represented as typed nodes, edges, and subgraphs updated through schema-constrained rewrites to provide a compact structural lens for designing and governing self-evolving agents.

Yuanyuan Xu, Wenjie Zhang, Yin Chen et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts