ReCo (Reward-Coordinated Compression), a step-wise framework in which a lightweight process-reward estimator scores each completed step and drives three components: reward-adaptive KV-cache compression that shrinks the retained cache harder at high-reward steps and less at low-reward ones, and a confidence-based early stopping that triggers when the reasoning is reliable.
Abstract
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel on complex tasks through long chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, but their lengthy intermediate steps cause severe overthinking that inflates inference cost. KV-cache compression is a common solution, yet existing reasoning-oriented methods apply a uniform policy across the trajectory and judge compression only by what it removes from the cache. Two observations point the other way. First, a reasoning state's tolerance to context loss varies along the trajectory, and process reward tracks it: deleting tokens at high-reward steps preserves accuracy far better than deleting the same budget at random. Second, compression is not free on the generation side, since a smaller cache leads the model to generate more tokens, partly canceling the saving. Together these motivate coordinating both sides under a single process reward. We propose ReCo (Reward-Coordinated Compression), a step-wise framework in which a lightweight process-reward estimator scores each completed step and drives three components: (1) reward-adaptive KV-cache compression that shrinks the retained cache harder at high-reward steps and less at low-reward ones, (2) a reward-banded penalty on reflection tokens that curbs redundant generation, and (3) confidence-based early stopping that triggers when the reasoning is reliable. Across three reasoning models and six benchmarks, ReCo reduces generated tokens by 37%-65% and end-to-end latency by 2.08x-2.35x over Full CoT, all while largely preserving accuracy.
BIRD(Bootstrapped Iterative Self-Reasoning Distillation), a two-stage self-reasoning distillation method that improves the rollout distribution before on-policy training and achieves a stronger accuracy-efficiency trade-off than prompting and cold-start on-policy distillation on MATH-500 and AIME benchmarks.
Leichao Dong, Dong-Xu Zhang, Yi-Ding Sun et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This work proposes ChainPrune, a novel reasoning path semantic structural optimization method to efficiently and controllably synthesize self-generated high-quality training data and incorporates a DPO-based preference learning method combined with supervised loss, effectively mitigating false reward suppression.
Weihang Pan, Zhengxu Yu, Yuxiang Zhang et al.· 1 citation
OS-Pruner is a lightweight plug-in framework that formulates chain-of-thought pruning as an optimal stopping problem that achieves 20-60\% reduction in generation length with minimal accuracy sacrifice on diverse reasoning benchmarks and base models.
Mohammed Ehab, Aymane El Gadarri, Vivek F. Farias et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A reasoning model is built that adaptively chooses how much to reason for each problem, and the brief modes end up more accurate than \textsc{Long}, which shows that the router sorts problems by difficulty rather than at random.
Gijs Kassenaar, Zhao Yang, Vincent François-Lavet· 2 citations
This work introduces StructReward, a compute-efficient framework that provides dense reinforcement signals through structured step-level reward alignment and substantially reduces the computational overhead of multimodal reinforcement learning.
Results show that learned token-level handoffs can reduce LLM use while preserving strong reasoning performance, and show that learned token-level handoffs can reduce LLM use while preserving strong reasoning performance.