Jun 2026· Herald of Kazakh-British technical university· Vol 23, pp. 312-325· 0 citations· 3 references
TL;DR
This paper proposes a robust translation scheme that converts trained decision trees into logical constraints, enabling constraint inference that guarantees demographic parity and local robustness at prediction time and demonstrates that the constrained model effectively eliminates demographic parity violations.
Abstract
As Artificial Intelligence systems are increasingly deployed in safety-critical domains such as healthcare and finance, ensuring their trustworthiness and compliance is paramount. While Deep Neural Networks have received significant attention in formal verification, traditional models such as Decision Trees, often preferred for their interpretability, cannot inherently enforce constraints after training for fairness and stability. This paper presents a novel, comprehensive approach for the formal verification of Decision Tree classifiers using Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). We propose a robust translation scheme that converts trained decision trees into logical constraints, enabling constraint inference that guarantees demographic parity and local robustness at prediction time. We implement this framework by using the z3 SMT solver and validate it on widely recognized fairness benchmarks, including UCI Adult, German Credit, and Loan Approval datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our constrained model effectively eliminates demographic parity violations with a marginal accuracy trade-off of less than 0.2%. This approach transforms the SMT solver from a simple diagnostic tool into a provably fair inference engine suitable for regulated industries.
This survey highlights how optimization- and certification-oriented reasoning can provide a useful framework for reasoning about differences in models, supporting tasks ranging from model training and selection to auditing and certification.
Results indicate that global feature importance, used as an active search signal rather than a post-hoc diagnostic, improves both the effectiveness and the efficiency of individual fairness testing.
H. Mamman, Abdullateef Oluwagbemiga Balogun, Mustapha Maidawa et al.· Journal of King Saud Univers...· 0 citations
This paper introduces C LUE (Clustering and Experience-based Verification) , a training-free, non-parametric verifier that improves selection and reranking in Large Language Model outputs and finds that correct and incorrect solutions exhibit measurable geometric differences in their hidden-state trajectories.
Zhenwen Liang, Ruosen Li, Yujun Zhou et al.· Annual Meeting of the Associ...· 0 citations
This work mathematically demonstrates that standard sampling methods fail efficiently for rare violations, motivating a direct structural approach and introduces an exact sampling procedure and closed-form risk statistics that provide feature-level attributions without requiring repetitive random trials or complex samp...
This case shows how evaluation-design validity can be checked structurally before model inference and why base correctness does not determine intervention-response fidelity.
Jun Luo, Ning Huang, Zi-Qi Sha et al.· 0 citations
A Genetic Algorithm–based Test Case Generation (GATCG) framework that combines knowledge-based reasoning with multi-objective evolutionary optimization to reveal unfair behavior dynamically is proposed that extends beyond single-metric detection to include automatic and adaptable fairness testing.