Skip to content
#small language model Open access

Knowledge Accuracy and Response Characteristics of an On-Device Large Language Model in Building Environmental Engineering: a Preliminary Case Study of EXAONE 4.0 1.2B Using ChatGPT-4o as a Cloud Reference

Aug 2026 · Architectural research · Vol 28 · 0 citations · 30 references

Abstract

This preliminary case study examines EXAONE 4.0 1.2B, an on-device large language model (LLM), in building environmental engineering, using ChatGPT-4o as a high-capability cloud reference rather than a size-matched competitor. Ten Korean-language items were evaluated: four multiple-choice, three single-step calculations, and three short-answer questions covering indoor environmental quality, energy, and post-occupancy evaluation. The same simple prompt condition was applied to both models, with no model-specific prompt optimization; therefore, the results represent one standardized condition rather than each model’s maximum performance. Both models answered all seven objective items correctly, although EXAONE showed terminology confusion in its reasoning on a thermal-environment item. Five doctoral-level experts rated the short-answer responses for accuracy, completeness, and logical consistency. Mean scores were 4.18 for ChatGPT-4o and 2.98 for EXAONE. Fleiss’ kappa was 0.020 and 0.044, while free-marginal kappa was 0.333 and 0.222, respectively; the latter values indicate fair, not moderate, agreement, so absolute expert scores require cautious interpretation. Qualitatively, ChatGPT-4o more consistently organized responses around concepts and scope, whereas EXAONE tended to provide specific technical, operational, and Korean-regulatory content but occasionally omitted canonical elements or added unsupported detail. Because the item pool is small and only one on-device model was tested, the findings are exploratory and cannot be generalized to building environmental engineering as a whole or to on-device LLMs as a class. The results support further investigation of on-device LLMs as supervised offline assistants where connectivity or external data transmission is constrained, but not as unsupervised tools for engineering calculation or compliance decisions.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

A Comparative Evaluation of Large Language Models for Enterprise Deployment: Performance, Safety, Cost, and Scalability Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Framework

The paper analyzes architectural trade-offs between dense transformers and Mixture-of-Experts designs, provides a deployment recommendation matrix, and contributes an extensible, evidence-based decision framework for enterprise AI practitioners.

Erarda Vuka, Jurgen Mecaj · 0 citations
#large language models Review Aug 2026

LLMs for Survey Text Analysis - A Performance Comparison Between Humans and GPT-5 on Inductive Content Analysis

Overall, the findings suggest that LLMs can approximate human coding in this case-specific setting, particularly at the coding level, and may serve as a scalable support tool for inductive qualitative analysis.

Leonardo Bergmann, Renata Gheorghiu, Ana Gvritishvili et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Large Language Models for Requirements Engineering: A Cross-Task Empirical Evaluation

This work presents the first cross-task empirical evaluation of LLMs spanning five RE-related activities, as well as replication materials supporting reproducibility, and a broader understanding of the capabilities, limitations, and practical readiness of current LLMs for RE.

Jacek Dabrowski, Manjeshwar Aniruddh Mallya, Alessio Ferrari et al. · 1 citation
Conference Jul 2026

From Jargon to Action: Evaluating Open-Weight LLMs for Plain Language Summaries of Pentest Reports

Penetration testing reports are a critical artifact in the cybersecurity workflow, yet their technical complexity frequently limits their utility for non-specialist stakeholders involved in risk remediation decisions. This paper investigates the feasibility of using four open-weight large language models, DeepSeek-r1:3...

Prerit Datta, M. Islam, Ryan Wojciechowski · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Advancing Fit-for-Purpose Access to CII Best Practices Using Multimodal Large Language Models

This research establishes a foundation for applying multimodal large language model (MLLM)-driven frameworks to construction knowledge curation and develops a new CII BP handbook and an artificial intelligence (AI) tool designed to improve CII knowledge accessibility and usability for member companies.

Gong Chen, M. Pedraza, Roya Albaloul et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Application Potential of Large Language Models as Product User Experience Evaluation Tools

Textual analysis reveals that LLM-generated UX evaluations exhibit strengths in systematic analysis, professional expression, and proactive risk identification; however, they show limitations in capturing nuanced emotions and dynamic interaction details.

Xiaoyue Mao, Jun Zhang, Yi-Jing Yang et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

MIT News · Artificial Intelligence Oct 15, 2026

AI model decodes the language cells use to communicate

A new computational approach reveals how cells communicate to assemble into tissues. This could accelerate stem cell engineering, improve disease models, and inform therapies.

Microsoft Research Blog Oct 15, 2026

Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar

Zero-knowledge proofs can verify computing results without rerunning workloads or exposing sensitive data. Magnetar helps bring them into the mainstream with support for standard programming languages, major speed gains, and quantum-resistant security. The post Proof-based general-purpose computing with Magnetar appeared first on Microsoft Research.

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.