Skip to content

One-shot Style Transfer LLM log-probabilities for Authorship Attribution and Verification

Oct 2025 · 3 citations · 52 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This work introduces an unsupervised framework that uses the log-probabilities of an LLM to measure style transferability between two texts, and proposes an additional mechanism that increases test-time computation to improve accuracy; enabling flexible trade-offs between computational cost and task performance.

Abstract

Computational stylometry studies writing style through quantitative textual patterns, enabling applications such as authorship attribution, identity linking, and plagiarism detection. Despite the relevance of language modeling to these tasks, the pre-training of modern large language models (LLMs) has been underutilized in authorship attribution and verification. We introduce an unsupervised framework that uses the log-probabilities of an LLM to measure style transferability between two texts. This framework takes advantage of the extensive Causal Language Modeling (CLM) pre-training, one-shot capabilities and scale of LLMs, avoiding explicit supervision. Our methods substantially outperform prompting-based unsupervised baselines in authorship verification at similar model sizes, and is competitive with or improves contrastive baselines in most settings with sufficient model scale. We further observe strong performance across non-English languages. The effectiveness of the proposed framework improves consistently with increasing model scale. In the case of authorship verification, we propose an additional mechanism that increases test-time computation to improve accuracy; enabling flexible trade-offs between computational cost and task performance.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

AuthBench: A Large-Scale Multilingual Benchmark for Authorship Representation across Genres and Lengths

AuthBench is introduced, a large-scale multilingual benchmark for authorship representation that is designed to make this evaluation broad, standardized, and realistic, and position it not only as a new benchmark, but as a diagnostic resource for studying when and why authorship representations succeed or fail.

Mao-Xun Huang, Zhen-Xing Zhang, C. Cardie · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

When Writing Style Drifts: Benchmarking Authorship Verification under Distribution Shifts in Genre, Time and the AI-Era

AVShift is introduced, the first German benchmark for systematically evaluating AV under multiple distribution shifts, and feature analysis reveals stylistic features that remain stable across genres, while their relative importance varies depending on the specific genre transition.

Lotta Kiefer, Brisca Balthes, Christoph Leiter et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Oct 2026

Author Representation Strategies for Zero-Shot Authorship Attribution: A Comparative Study of LLM-Based and Embedding-Based Approaches

Authorship Attribution (AA) requires capturing fine-grained stylistic characteristics, making it particularly challenging in zero-shot (ZS) settings where no task-specific supervision is available. In this work, we investigate the effect of author representations on ZS AA by evaluating a label-only prompting baseline t...

Nudrat Habib, Tosin P. Adewumi, Sana Al-azzawi et al. · 0 citations
#natural language process... Preprint Sep 2026

Forging LLM Authorship Fingerprints with Targeted Rewriting

Model-attribution classifiers can often identify which language model produced a text, making model-specific writing patterns a signal of provenance. Accurate attribution on unmodified text, however, does not show whether the prediction still identifies the original source after deliberate rewriting. We formulate this...

Hao-Han Yuan, Si-Min Chen, Xi Niu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

PersonalBench: Measuring the Authorship Gap in LLM Personalization

PersonalBench is introduced, a benchmark that evaluates inference-time personalization methods through three independent lenses: LUAR (a trained authorship verification model), an LLM-as-judge, and automated stylometrics, which finds that personalization methods do produce author-differentiated output but this differen...

Yashwant Sawant · 1 citation

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.