Jul 2026· Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery· Vol 120, pp.
290-299
· 0 citations· 25 references
Medicine
TL;DR
XGBoost is retained as the principal model based on combined superiority in discrimination and calibration, with random forest as a robust comparator, and prospective external validation with recalibration is required before clinical adoption.
Abstract
Background
Flap-related vascular complications requiring surgical reintervention remain a source of morbidity after microsurgical free flap reconstruction and preoperative risk estimation relies on clinical judgement. Therefore, we developed and internally validated a strictly preoperative multivariable model for this outcome.
Methods
A retrospective cohort of 650 consecutive adults at two high-volume referral centres (649 analysable) was analysed. The primary outcome was unplanned re-exploration within 30 days for arterial, venous, mixed thrombosis, or clinically significant vasospasm. Nineteen preoperative predictors were considered; intraoperative and surgeon variables were excluded. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest, and XGBoost were fitted on a 70% training partition and evaluated on a 30% test set. Performance was assessed using discrimination (AUC), calibration (intercept, slope, ICI, and E/O), and Brier score. Reporting followed TRIPOD; risk of bias used the four-domain PROBAST.
Results
Event rate was 17.1% (111/649). XGBoost achieved the highest discrimination (AUC 0.84; 95% CI 0.74-0.92) and relatively better calibration (intercept 0.02, slope 0.87, ICI 0.039, E/O 0.89). Random forest showed comparable discrimination (AUC 0.82; 0.71-0.90) but poorer calibration (slope 1.33). LASSO demonstrated the lowest discrimination (AUC 0.79; 0.69-0.88). Prior oncologic history, surgical indication, and flap composition were influential predictors. A decile table from XGBoost showed a monotonic gradient, with events rising from ≤10% in lower deciles to 80% (95% CI 58-92) in the top decile.
Conclusions
XGBoost is retained as the principal model based on combined superiority in discrimination and calibration, with random forest as a robust comparator. The model is not decision-ready, and prospective external validation with recalibration is required before clinical adoption.
LAY SUMMARY
Using 649 analysable free flap reconstructions, we developed preoperative models to predict unplanned surgical reintervention for flap-related vascular complications within 30 days. XGBoost performed the best (AUC 0.84), supporting risk stratification before surgery, but prospective external validation is needed before clinical use.
Generalized ACS NSQIP morbidity prediction was accurate in aggregate but systematically miscalibrated across the operative-time gradient, overestimating risk in shorter operations and underestimating it in longer operations.
Shaan Sekhon, Miracle Uzoekwe, Casey Tompkins-Rhoades et al.· Journal of reconstructive mi...· 0 citations
This study developed both traditional statistical and machine learning models to predict the risk of developing a 90‐day postoperative complication after autologous reconstruction.
Jonlin Chen, Ariel Gabay, Abbas M. Hassan et al.· Journal of Surgical Oncology· 0 citations
The findings suggest that tumor characteristics may play a substantial role in determining outcomes; however, the observational design does not allow independent assessment of the causal effect of the surgical approach.
L. Bonosi, U.E. Benigno, G. Giammalva et al.· Skull Base· 0 citations
Thresholds of average QP ≥ 49 and minimum QP < 33, integrated with Yale Grade ≤ 3, provide a practical, tiered framework for intraoperative decision-making for intraoperative risk stratification.
Alina Yizhuo Shen, Lauren Valentine, Renee Gao et al.· Annals of Surgical Oncology· 0 citations
This study identified six variables associated with AOFAS-defined poor postoperative functional recovery in patients with CLAI and developed an internally validated nomogram for individualized risk estimation.
Feng Lin, Zhiyao Lv, Zhidong Zhao et al.· Frontiers in Surgery· 0 citations
Findings suggest that prediction of amputation level is feasible, validated in a temporally separated cohort, and clinically interpretable, and may support future decision-support applications, although further validation is required before clinical implementation.
Kerim Bora Yılmaz, Gokalp Tulum, F. Cuce et al.· Frontiers in Endocrinology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.