Jun 2026· arXiv.org· Vol abs/2606.31134· 2 citations· 57 references
Computer Science
TL;DR
This work introduces *Theo*, an agentic autoformalization framework powered by general coding LLMs, and successfully formalizes their main theorems and proofs and validate the generated formalizations with human experts.
Abstract
While Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in mathematical reasoning, they frequently produce subtle errors that evade human detection. Formal mathematical languages like Lean 4 offer mechanical proof checking, strongly motivating the need for autoformalization: the automatic translation of natural language mathematics into verifiable code. Recent trends indicate that general-purpose LLMs, heavily optimized for standard programming, now outperform smaller models explicitly fine-tuned for Lean. Leveraging this shift, we introduce *Theo*, an agentic autoformalization framework powered by general coding LLMs. At the core of our system is an orchestrator that manages a multi-agent pipeline tailored for research-level mathematics. Because cutting-edge research frequently relies on concepts outside the scope of existing libraries like Mathlib, our system dynamically extends necessary type definitions and validates them via a novel Auxiliary Lemma technique before formalizing the primary theorems. We applied our approach to PutnamBench, producing machine-checked Lean proofs for a random sample of 32 problems. Furthermore, we evaluate our system on seven research papers---five from the ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC) and two recent OpenAI manuscripts---spanning combinatorics, communication complexity, mechanism design, learning theory, number theory, discrete geometry, and graph theory. We successfully formalize their main theorems and proofs and validate the generated formalizations with human experts; notably, two developments require no axioms beyond Lean's kernel. All of our formalizations are available at https://beyondthelibrary.github.io/formal_arxiv/.
It is argued that the next leap in AI4Math systems requires a decisive shift from predefined problem-solvers to research agents that can address frontier mathematical challenges with rigorous formal mathematical reasoning, highlighting core limitations of existing systems in serving as mathematical research agents.
E. Jiang, Xiao Liang, Yikai Zhang et al.· 1 citation
MathForm is introduced, an autoformalization framework for constructing verified training data through Mathlib knowledge retrieval and verification-guided iterative refinement, and outperforming multiple specialized 32B autoformalizers.
Lushi Pu, Weiming Zhang, Xinheng Xie et al.· 0 citations
Reducing bug-triggering programs to their minimal essential form is a fundamental task in debugging language processors such as compilers and interpreters. Existing reduction techniques are limited by their reliance on predefined, syntax-driven transformations that lack semantic understanding of the target program, and...
Xintong Zhou, Hongxu Xu, Chun-Feng Liao et al.· 0 citations
ToMap is introduced, a multi-agent framework that structures proof autoformalization as a Decomposer-Formalizer-Prover pipeline with efficient test-time optimization guided by formal verification and semantic rubrics for proof quality.
AoA lifts the agent off source text and onto the abstract syntax tree (AST): the model supplies proofs as JSON representations of Minilang's AST and drives the prover through a tree-edit model that fuses proof operations and states into one proof tree, so each operation carries its own subgoal's state, readable directl...
Qiyuan Xu, Joshua Ong Jun Leang, Renxi Wang et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This paper systematically compares four state-of-the-art LLMs, including Gemini~3.1~Pro, GPT-5.4, and Claude~Opus~4, on a FormalMATH subset and on two real PDE theorems requiring deep domain expertise, evaluating their ability to produce verified Lean~4 proofs and to identify errors in deliberately incorrect proofs.
Junjie Zhang, Jia-Yin Liu, Wenbin Liu et al.· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.