Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in cybersecurity workflows, yet it remains unclear whether they can perform structured security reasoning or merely rely on superficial cues and prior knowledge. We study this question in the context of defence selection over attack graphs derived from real-world threat scenarios, including ransomware, supply-chain compromise, cloud abuse, Kubernetes attacks, POS malware, and ICS/OT intrusion. Given a budget constraint, LLMs must select security controls to minimise attacker success. We compare their strategies against each other and against a game-theoretic optimization baseline used as a normative reference for structured reasoning. Our results show that LLMs exhibit conditional competence. When explicit attack-graph structure is provided, they often produce coherent strategies close to the optimization baseline. However, their capabilities are fragile. LLM behaviour becomes increasingly fragile with graph complexity and is highly sensitive to framing. Small prompt changes can substantially alter rankings, and merely relabeling a poor strategy as ``optimal''dramatically improves its evaluation. We further observe a non-monotonic relationship between formal risk and LLM judgement: strategies closest to the optimum are not necessarily ranked highest by LLM evaluators. To further probe reasoning ability, we ask LLMs to generate solvers for the same optimization problem. While the generated implementations recover the correct high-level formulation, they scale poorly compared to a purpose-built solver. Overall, our findings show that LLMs can approximate structured cybersecurity reasoning under controlled representations, but do not apply it robustly. This has important implications for the design and evaluation of AI-assisted security decision-support systems.
LifeSciBench is introduced, a benchmark of 750 expert-authored tasks designed to evaluate whether language models can handle realistic life science research work, with each constituent task paired with a human expert-written rubric.
Amelia Liu, Andrew Ho, Anne Marie Droste et al.· bioRxiv· 2 citations
A rapidly advancing precision-therapy pipeline-including antisense oligonucleotides to upregulate the intact allele, AAV-based gene replacement, CRISPR-mediated transcriptional activation, epigenetic modulators, and rational pathway-targeted small molecules-offers realistic prospects for disease modification.
Autistic children experience disproportionately high rates of anxiety, yet common interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy and traditional mindfulness practices may be less effective due to their cognitive and abstract demands. Yoga nidra, a form of guided meditation using concrete visualisations and breath awareness, may offer a more accessible alternative. This mixed methods study evaluated the feasibility and pilot efficacy of a co-designed six-week online yoga nidra intervention targeting anxiety in autistic children aged 8-14 years. Neurophysiological and psychological data were collected from 13 participants using parent- and self-reported measures of anxiety (ASC-ASD), intolerance of uncertainty (IUSC), and emotion dysregulation (EDI), alongside heart rate variability (HRV). Notably, the cohort included a minimally speaking child, which demonstrates the potential for the intervention to extend to autistic children with language support needs, a group who are often underrepresented in similar research. Results indicated no statistically significant changes in anxiety over time; however, medium effect sizes were observed in self- (Hedge's g = 0.55) and parent-reported anxiety (Hedge's g = 0.45), with three participants moving from clinically significant to non-significant anxiety levels post-intervention. Additionally, intolerance of uncertainty and emotion dysregulation demonstrated small to medium effect size reductions (IUSC, Hedge's g = 0.50; EDI-Reactivity, Hedge's g = 0.55; EDI-Dysphoria, Hedge's g = 0.25), suggesting potential benefits of yoga nidra in these areas. Greater attendance was significantly associated with self-reported reductions in anxiety (ASC-ASD-SR, r = .757, p < .05), but not the other outcome measures. Unexpectedly, HRV outcomes indicated reduced autonomic functioning post-intervention. Additionally, qualitative data from semi-structured interviews with three child participants and their mothers from the study were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis, revealing five key themes of their experience: Thinking About the Body is Hard; We Want More; Homework Sucks; Making Mindfulness Concrete; and On-Screen and At Home is Convenient. While the online format was appreciated for its accessibility, challenges with adherence and scheduling highlighted the need for more flexible delivery models. This study advances upon prior research by being the first to develop a co-designed yoga nidra intervention specifically for autistic children. Findings support the feasibility of yoga nidra as a complementary intervention for autistic children and suggest directions for future research, including larger trials and further co-design with the autistic community.
Tundi Loftus, Shu H Yau, Sophia Soares et al.· Research in Developmental Di...· 1 citation
TestifAI, a deep learning testing framework for efficient and accurate estimation of robustness against combinations of perturbations, is proposed and partial model tomography is introduced, a novel approach to reconstructing model behaviour in a multi-perturbation space from tests that apply only a small number of perturbations.
Arooj Arif, T. Hartung, E. Botoeva et al.· 1 citation
Dense causal attention remains expensive at long context even when implemented with highly optimized exact kernels. We study BF1, a deterministic block-aligned dyadic sparse-attention route that combines a small exact local neighborhood, a global first block, and logarithmically spaced historical blocks. The route is related to prior log-sparse and dilated attention patterns; our contribution is a correctness-gated pretrained-model retrofit, a matched topology-control study, and a systems characterization that connects per-layer sparsity to whole-model latency. For fixed block width, every converted layer uses O(n log n) selected token interactions and has O(log n) graph communication depth. On an NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell GPU, an optimized BF16 implementation crosses dense attention between 2K and 4K tokens and reaches a 10.91x per-layer prefill speedup at 32K. Retrofitting eight of 28 Qwen3-0.6B attention layers lowers warm whole-model time to first token by 7.7%, 11.3%, and 15.3% at 8K, 16K, and 32K, respectively, while the remaining dense layers keep the complete model asymptotically quadratic. Under a matched 1,000-step, 16.384M-token adaptation protocol, BF1 ranks first across three training seeds: mean report perplexity is 1.68639 versus 1.69154 for a matched static-random nonlocal graph, 1.69258 for dense continued training, and 1.81505 for equal-budget local sliding. At seed 1234, the packed-report paired interval places Dense-CT 0.3169-0.4055% above BF1 and static-random graph 17 0.2441-0.3642% above BF1. These results establish BF1 as a reproducible sparse operator and selective retrofit primitive with real long-context systems value. This paper evaluates numerical correctness, selected-interaction scaling, kernel performance, partial-model inference, and matched next-token language modeling.
Large Language Models show potential in their diagnostic accuracy and consequent ability to reduce clinician burden, and may provide the greatest benefit when used to optimise referral quality at source, improving both clinician and potentially LLM triage downstream.
K. Surendran, I. Aziz, Glyndwr Jenkins· Current Surgery Reports· 0 citations
A new method for surgically removing training examples from a model reveals that as datasets grow, the link between what a model learns and what it produces dissolves.