Skip to content

An Explainable Coherence Score for Detecting Temporal Inconsistencies in Political News

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 24 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

The Temporal Coherence Score (TCS), a continuous, intrinsically interpretable metric that quantifies the temporal coherence of a news article, is introduced by a four-stage pipeline: extraction of temporal facts, construction of a temporal knowledge graph, hierarchical verification against internal consistency rules and external reference sources, and score aggregation with automatically generated explanations.

Abstract

Temporal inconsistencies, such as mandates attributed outside their real interval, events presented as past before they occurred, or inverted causal sequences, are a form of political disinformation that evades style-based fake news detectors: a well-written article with a single wrong date carries no lexical signal of falsehood. This paper introduces the Temporal Coherence Score (TCS), a continuous, intrinsically interpretable metric that quantifies the temporal coherence of a news article, computed by a four-stage pipeline: extraction of temporal facts, construction of a temporal knowledge graph, hierarchical verification against internal consistency rules and external reference sources, and score aggregation with automatically generated explanations. Verification combines eight internal checkers derived from Allen's interval algebra with a five-level external hierarchy ranging from a locally stored reference knowledge base of 1{,}256 curated political facts to live Wikidata SPARQL queries. On a benchmark of 100 political news articles with injected temporal errors, the system reaches a precision of 0.909 at the selected operating threshold, with a single residual false positive, a profile deliberately tuned for human-in-the-loop fact-checking assistance, where false alarms are costlier than missed detections. Unlike lexical baselines that output only a binary label, every flagged article is accompanied by the inconsistency type, the entities involved, and the reference source that contradicts the claim.

View source

Similar papers

Open access 2026

EviGraphRAG: Constraint-Verified Retrieval-Augmented Question Answering over Event Knowledge Graphs

EviGraphRAG is proposed, a ranker-agnostic reliability layer that separates candidate ranking from exact verification and explicit abstention, and exact conjunction over represented event constraints and linked source-record connectivity can improve selective reliability, while parser quality and candidate retrieval re...

Yu-Teng Sun, Yang Su, Xu-An Wang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Walking on the DARKSIDE

The evidence supports an architectural claim: when an LLM forward pass is wrapped in an ontology-mediated auditing, structurally inevitable hallucination can be partially recovered.

A. Gangemi, E. Bottazzi · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Ingest-Time Fact Compilation for Cost-Efficient and Reliable Question Answering over Revised Corpora

This work presents ingest-time fact compilation, an architecture that performs this work when corpus data is ingested or changed and supports a narrow but practical claim: resolving a corpus state once can make subsequent QA cheaper and more reliable for inexpensive models.

Kyle Wild, Yusuke Takahashi, Asako Uraki · 0 citations
Conference Aug 2026

Arbiter-RAG: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Conflict Resolution and Temporal Consistency in Autonomous Knowledge Graphs

Knowledge graphs play a vital role in grounding Large Language Models (LLMs) in verifiable facts, which matters wherever facts evolve continuously and stale information is costly, as in clinical informatics. However, existing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems suffer from "structural hallucination," where con...

H. Bukhari, Yong-Qiang Cheng, Qing-De Li · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Aug 2026

Retrieving Relations, Detecting Fallacies: A RAG Approach to Political Debate Analysis

This work introduces a guided retrieval-augmented methodology for fallacy detection and classification that leverages argumentative relations of support and attack to dynamically steer the extraction of relevant documents when retrieval is argumentatively guided.

Deborah Dore, Greta Damo, Elena Cabrio et al. · 0 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.