Skip to content

Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Voice Across Different Degrees of Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

Aug 2026 · Journal of Voice · 0 citations · 15 references
Medicine

Abstract

Objective

To determine whether increasing severity of untreated bilateral sensorineural hearing loss is associated with severity-related alterations in perceptual, acoustic, aerodynamic, videolaryngostroboscopic, and patient-reported voice outcomes.

Methods

This prospective cross-sectional study included 150 adults allocated equally to five hearing-threshold groups: normal hearing (<25 dB HL), mild hearing loss (26-40 dB HL), moderate hearing loss (41-55 dB HL), moderately severe hearing loss (56-70 dB HL), and severe hearing loss (71-90 dB HL). Voice evaluation included GRBAS ratings, videolaryngostroboscopy, maximum phonation time, s/z ratio, acoustic analysis, and the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10). Overall group comparisons used the Kruskal-Wallis H test or chi-square tests. Dunn-Bonferroni tests were used for post-hoc comparisons. Spearman correlation assessed ordered trends, and age- and sex-adjusted regression analyses evaluated independent associations.

Results

Voice complaints (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact P < 0.001), shouting behavior (Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact P < 0.001), and vocal loudness category (χ²(8) = 21.11, P = 0.007) differed among groups and were most prominent in Group 5. Videolaryngostroboscopic regularity (H(4) = 18.99, P < 0.001), GRBAS total score (H(4) = 18.35, P = 0.001), fundamental frequency (H(4) = 22.36, P < 0.001), and VHI-10 (H(4) = 16.99, P = 0.002) also differed among groups. Ordered associations were observed for vibratory irregularity (ρ = 0.288), GRBAS total score (ρ = 0.281), fundamental frequency (ρ = 0.350), and VHI-10 (ρ = 0.263; all P ≤ 0.001).

Conclusion

Greater hearing-loss severity was associated with subtle but measurable changes in perceptual voice quality, vibratory regularity, pitch, and self-reported voice handicap. These findings demonstrate association rather than causation; impaired auditory feedback is a plausible mechanism that requires confirmation in longitudinal or interventional studies.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.