Jul 2026· Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference· pp. 2173-2178· 0 citations· 39 references
Abstract
This work investigates whether writing style is associated with stance alignment in large scale online discourse. We construct a Reddit based pipeline that transforms r/AskReddit questions and comments interactions into stance units using large language models (LLMs), stylistic embeddings, and semantic embeddings. The study begins with 169,053 original AskReddit questions, categorizes them into 48 semantic classes, and filters them for “stance suitability”. The full question corpus contains 176,932 rows; in the target stance evaluation stage, 22,238 original questions from 10 selected semantic classes are paired with up to 200 top level comments each and annotated by an LLM, yielding 277,474 comment level model outputs and 352,407 stance instances. Style is represented with answer text embeddings trained to capture writing style, while semantic context is represented with embeddings of question summaries, stance targets, and canonical opinions. We analyze 8,000,000 randomly sampled stance instance pairs by measuring style similarity, topic similarity, and stance label agreement. Across topic similarity thresholds from 0.50 to 0.95, pairs with high stylistic similarity consistently show higher model annotated stance agreement than the topic similar baseline, with lifts of approximately 6% to 12% points. A parallel augmentation analysis shows that synthetic questions produced by the tested models under generalize real class diversity, motivating the use of original questions for the main stance analysis. These findings suggest that writing style carries a weak but measurable signal related to stance alignment under semantically controlled conditions.
This paper presents a framework that preserves semantics in LLM-based opinion summarization while minimizing token usage and computational cost and demonstrates that this method significantly reduces token usage and computational cost while consistently outperforming traditional AI-based and standard LLM summarization...
This study proposes a robust and semantically enriched framework for conversation understanding based on a composite distributed representation that incorporates both temporal adjacency and semantic proximity between utterances, enabling the visualization of key conversational connections.
Large language models (LLMs) are known to be sensitive to prompt and input formulations. However, existing studies have focused on lexical realization and largely ignored constructional choice. This paper studies whether linguistic construction can systematically shift LLM decisions and where these shifts can be causal...
Langchen Huang, Sebastian Padó, Franziska Weeber· arXiv.org· 0 citations
A rationale-guided knowledge distillation framework for cross-lingual stance detection using Chain-of-Thought prompting to guide Large Language Models in generating informative rationales, and distill the resulting reasoning knowledge into a compact student model.
Stance classification in Natural Language Processing (NLP) is not just an academic exercise but a crucial tool for understanding political discourse and the attitudes underlying political statements. This research addresses the challenge of limited annotated datasets in political science by proposing a practical senten...
Juan-Francisco Reyes· Journal for Language Technol...· 0 citations
A framework for stance detection in Manipuri editorial articles is proposed and the model reduces confusion between FOR and NEUTRAL editorials, which is one of the most critical problems for stance identification.