Aug 2026· Advanced Functional Materials· 0 citations· 83 references
Physics
TL;DR
This Perspective systematically discusses Physics-Grounded Materials AI (PhysMat AI) as a unifying perspective for integrating physical knowledge into materials intelligence through five complementary roles: physics as prior knowledge, descriptors, constraints, verifiers, and infrastructure.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming materials discovery, yet conventional data‐driven approaches often suffer from limited interpretability, poor extrapolation, and inconsistency with physical laws. Since materials behavior is fundamentally governed by thermodynamics, kinetics, electronic structure, transport processes, and operating environments, the next generation of materials intelligence must move beyond correlation‐based prediction toward physics‐grounded reasoning. In this Perspective, we systematically discuss Physics‐Grounded Materials AI (PhysMat AI) as a unifying perspective for integrating physical knowledge into materials intelligence through five complementary roles: physics as prior knowledge, descriptors, constraints, verifiers, and infrastructure. Using representative examples from catalysis, solid‐state electrolytes in solid‐state battery, and hydrogen‐storage materials, we illustrate how physical principles guide data representation, model reasoning, validation workflows, and knowledge management. We further present how AI agents can leverage these physics‐aware components to perform mechanism‐guided discovery within physically feasible search spaces. Finally, we outline a developmental roadmap from physics‐aware AI to physics‐reasoning AI and ultimately physics‐autonomous AI. Looking forward, materials intelligence should evolve from predictive models toward autonomous scientific systems capable of integrating physical reasoning, multiscale simulations, experimental validation, and continuous knowledge updating for reliable materials discovery.
A seven-tier physics-informed inverse-design framework integrating chemistry, thermodynamics, transport, electrochemistry, durability, cell compatibility, and manufacturability is proposed, providing a general framework for AI-enabled autonomous materials discovery across energy-storage materials and other functional materials.
Machine learning (ML) in materials science refers to computational methods that learn statistical, structural, or physics-informed relationships from experimental, computational, and literature-derived materials data. These methods are used to predict materials properties, identify structure–property and process–structure–property–performance relationships, discover candidate materials, optimize synthesis and processing routes, and guide functional applications. ML is narrower than artificial intelligence (AI), which also includes broader reasoning, planning, search, and automation capabilities. It is also distinct from materials informatics, which is the wider data-centered framework that includes databases, descriptors, metadata, workflows, visualization, and knowledge management. ML can complement high-throughput computation by building surrogate models from density functional theory, finite-element simulation, molecular dynamics, or experimental data, but it is not identical to high-throughput screening itself. Unlike conventional physics-based modeling, which begins with explicit governing equations or mechanistic assumptions, ML usually infers predictive relationships from data; modern approaches increasingly combine both perspectives through physics-informed features, uncertainty quantification, and human expertise.
This work will present the current work on inverse material design, where AI methods—particularly generative pretrained transformers—are used to predict new material candidates based on desired properties, pushing the boundaries of materials innovation.
I. Gonzales, R. Ullberg, Andrew H Salij et al.· ECS Meeting Abstracts· 0 citations
The intrinsic challenges of accessing historical dark data in materials science are described and contrasted with timely opportunities for leveraging massive amounts of experimental data from laboratories in going forwards; by exploiting electronic-lab notebooks, high-throughput experiments, and digital-twin technologies.
Jacqueline M. Cole· Advances in Materials· 0 citations
This Perspective traces the evolution of thermal transport science from its empirical origins through the current AI-driven renaissance, and examines the limitations of conventional density-functional-theory-based phonon workflows, the emergence of universal machine learning interatomic potentials (uMLPs), graph-neural-network screening architectures such as the Crystal Attention Graph Neural Network (CATGNN), and generative inverse-design frameworks.
Ming Hu· Journal of Materials Science...· 0 citations
A common methodological pattern recurs across all three domains: AI is used not to replace physical theory but to navigate high-dimensional parameter spaces that are analytically or computationally intractable by classical means alone, and the strongest, most defensible results are those subjected to independent, domain-expert critical appraisal rather than accepted at face value.
R. Mishra, Divyansh Mishra, R. Agarwal· International journal of phy...· 0 citations