Skip to content
Conference

A Preliminary Study on How AI Coding Agents Describe Refactoring Activities

Jul 2026 · Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference · pp. 543-548 · 0 citations · 16 references

Abstract

Refactoring is essential for maintaining and evolving software systems, yet we still have limited insight into how automated code-generation agents describe these changes in pull requests. In this study, we analyze refactoring-related pull requests produced by five AI coding agents, with a particular focus on how their intentions are communicated through pull request descriptions. To better understand recurring transformation patterns, we extract refactoring descriptors terms that capture different refactoring activities and use them to identify similarities across agents. We then classify the pull requests into three main categories: internal quality attributes, external quality attributes, and code smells. Our dataset includes 2,288 unique AIgenerated refactoring pull requests from OpenAI Codex, Devin, GitHub Copilot, Cursor, and Claude Code. The results reveal several limitations in how AI systems perform and document refactoring, highlighting the need for clearer and more structured communication in collaborative software development.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Jul 2026

A Preliminary Study on How AI Coding Agents Describe Refactoring Activities

Refactoring is essential for maintaining and evolving software systems, yet we still have limited insight into how automated code-generation agents describe these changes in pull requests. In this study, we analyze refactoring-related pull requests produced by five AI coding agents, with a particular focus on how their...

Aymen Masmoudi, Belhassen Khefacha, Andrew Haralambous et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

RefactorAssist: Agentic Refinement for Reliable Code Refactoring

Results indicate that static checks and test-guided, context-aware agentic repair can increase the reliability of LLM-generated refactorings, bringing them closer to practical integration within developer workflows.

Jonathan Cordeiro, Shayan Noei, Ying Zou · 1 citation
Review Jul 2026

How Do Practitioners Build SE Agents? Insights from a Mixed-Methods Study

This paper is the first to study how SE processes are changing in the development of SE agents and what challenges developers face, and describes a seven-stage workflow and five process shifts, including a move toward evaluation-driven development.

Yunbo Lyu, David Williams, Jieke Shi et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

How Do AI Coding Agents Contribute to Software Development? an Empirical Study of Agentic Pull Requests

This study characterize agentic pull requests (PR) in comparison to human generated PRs and to examine how their properties change across different stages of the development lifecycle, offering a more nuanced understanding of their benefits and limitations in real-world practices.

Iren Mazloomzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi Morovati, F. Khomh · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

How Experienced Developers Can Get More Value from Agents

AI agents are becoming a fundamental part of modern software creation, helping developers in generating code, debugging, designing systems, etc. But there is a clear difference between how beginners and experienced software engineers get benefits from these tools. Newbies usually depend on agents for one-time prompts a...

Madhurima Kommuru, Srujana Pulipaka · 0 citations
Book Open access Jul 2026

CODENS: Transforming Code Changes into Living, Accessible, and Queryable Documentation

Results show that CODENS produces highly relevant and well-grounded answers, while qualitative feedback highlights a remaining challenge in concise, documentation-oriented synthesis.

Abdelhak Kelious, Chyrine Tahri, E. Bardet · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.