Skip to content
Preprint

DWM: Separating World Effects from Actions in Latent World Models

Jul 2026 · 1 citation · 29 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

DWM (Decomposed World Model), a supervision-level framework that operationalizes an explicit additive decomposition of the predicted transition into an action-invariant and a complementary action-driven component, without altering the underlying architecture or inference pipeline.

Abstract

Latent world models underpin much of modern model-based control, yet current action-conditioned formulations supervise the next-latent transition with a single, undifferentiated target, forcing a monolithic learning signal to absorb every source of state change. In real world, however, transitions arise from two heterogeneous sources: an action-driven component induced by the agent, and an action-invariant world effect -- the change that would still occur under a null action, dictated by the environment's intrinsic dynamics (e.g., gravity-driven sliding, inertia, contact rebound, and persistent drift). Fusing them into a single target entangles the two inside the latent transition, prevents the model from attributing observed changes to their underlying causes, and undermines the transferability of the learned dynamics. We introduce DWM (Decomposed World Model), a supervision-level framework that operationalizes this decomposition. DWM augments the predictor of a latent world model with an auxiliary world head, regularized by a normalized world-contrastive objective to be action-invariant, while the original pred head is coupled to it via an orthogonality constraint; together, the two signals induce an explicit additive decomposition of the predicted transition into an action-invariant and a complementary action-driven component, without altering the underlying architecture or inference pipeline. To evaluate DWM under persistent world effects, we construct W-variants of three standard control benchmarks -- PushT-W, Reacher-W, and TwoRoom-W -- each instantiating a distinct action-invariant dynamic. DWM matches strong baselines on the flat counterparts and delivers a mean absolute improvement of 13.1% in CEM planning success across the W-variants.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Is Forward Prediction Enough? Physical State Grounding for JEPA World Models

PSG-JEPA is proposed, a physically grounded JEPA world model that shapes its latent space with two complementary grounding objectives beyond forward prediction: grounding individual latents in robot proprioceptive state, and grounding latent pairs in multi-horizon joint-angle changes.

Hao-Dong Yan, Jia-Guang Zhu, Ming-Ming Jia et al. · 7 citations · ⚡1
Jul 2026

On the Identifiability of Controlled World Models

A joint identifiability condition for controlled world models with Gaussian latent states with Gaussian latent states is presented, which consists of two coupled components: representation identifiability and transition identifiability, and it is proved that when this condition holds, minimizing the LeJEPA-style predic...

Xiangteng Zhang, Yang Guan, Bo Zhang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Reduced-Order Models: The Mother of World Models

It is argued that the outstanding obstacle to deploying world models in systems that cannot fail -- power, thermal, process control -- is not predictive fidelity but verifiability, and a research agenda for physics-grounded, verifiable world models is outlined that unifies the two lineages.

Rajat Ghosh · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

Orthogonal JEPA: Factorized Predictive States for Latent World Models

Method, a latent world-modeling framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization, is introduced, a latent world-modeling framework based on orthogonal predictive factorization that can be used by a readout, decoder, planner, or autoregressive rollout of an underlying system.

Tao-Yong Cui, Pheng-Ann Heng, Wan-Li Ouyang · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Dueling World Models: Advantage-Style Action Channels for Common-Mode Distractor Rejection

In latent dynamics, subtracting a prediction's mean effect over actions cancels whatever the actions share--the action-independent variation where distractors live--leaving a clean, controllable channel, with no reward, no reconstruction, and no distractor-specific auxiliary loss.

Jiazhuo Li, Yiming Fei, Zhiruo Zhou et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.