Back to #artificial intelligence

Position: Behavioral Systems Require Behavioral Tests

May 2026 · 0 citations · 114 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This paper argues that AI agents must be evaluated like other behavioral systems: through systematic observation, perturbation, and interpretation of their actions, and proposes a research agenda focused on developing rigorous behavioral tests.

Abstract

Artificial agentic systems increasingly operate as behavioral systems by interacting with dynamic environments, pursuing goals, and adapting over time. Yet, current evaluation methods largely focus on performance outcomes, not the underlying behavioral processes that produce them. This paper argues that AI agents must be evaluated like other behavioral systems: through systematic observation, perturbation, and interpretation of their actions. We draw on lessons from the behavioral sciences to motivate this position, and propose a research agenda focused on developing rigorous behavioral tests. These include methods for recovering decision strategies from action sequences, constructing environments that isolate behavioral differences, and probing emergent dynamics in multi-agent systems. Taken together, these directions offer a roadmap for developing a science of AI behavior.

View source

Similar papers

#artificial intelligence Review Dec 2025

Professional Software Developers Don't Vibe, They Control: AI Agent Use for Coding in 2025

Investigating how experienced developers use agents in building software, including their motivations, strategies, task suitability, and sentiments finds that while experienced developers value agents as a productivity boost, they retain their agency in software design and implementation out of insistence on fundamental software quality attributes.

Ruanqianqian Huang, Avery Reyna, Sorin Lerner et al. · 19 citations · ⚡1
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Jan 2026

A systematic review of machine learning techniques to address diagnosis and treatment of autism: challenges and opportunities

This systematic review evaluates 55 studies from 2017 to 2023 on the application of machine learning techniques to ASD, highlighting key challenges and opportunities, particularly the need for models that can integrate complex data to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes.

Rafael Muñoz-Terol, Jesús Peral, Sandra Amador et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1

Convergent Evolution: How Different Language Models Learn Similar Number Representations

This paper identifies two different routes through which models can acquire geometrically separable features: they can learn them from complementary co-occurrence signals in general language data, including text-number co-occurrence and cross-number interaction, or from multi-token addition problems.

Deqing Fu, Tianyi Zhou, Mikhail Belkin et al. · 3 citations
#artificial intelligence Open access May 2025

TabularQGAN: a quantum generative model for tabular data synthesis

A novel quantum generative model for synthesizing tabular data by proposing a quantum generative adversarial network architecture with flexible data encoding and a novel quantum circuit ansatz for effectively modeling tabular data is introduced.

P. Bhardwaj, Caitlin Jones, Lasse Dierich et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Jun 2026

Self-Evolving Agents as Dynamic Graph Transformation: A Survey and New Perspective

This survey model agent state as a dynamic graph, where memories, tools, skills, workflows, and inter-agent relations are represented as typed nodes, edges, and subgraphs updated through schema-constrained rewrites to provide a compact structural lens for designing and governing self-evolving agents.

Yuanyuan Xu, Wenjie Zhang, Yin Chen et al. · 2 citations

Related blog posts