Nested-EAGLE (Experimental Artificial intelligence Global and Limited-area Ensemble) is presented, showing that the skill gains for near-surface fields stem from incorporating high-resolution regional analysis data into training through the nesting process, and provides the most accurate forecasts of storm locations at longer leads, despite blurred extrema.
Abstract
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) employs independent prediction systems for distinct forecast products. While some separation is practical, we argue that combining short- and medium-range weather into a single prediction system would provide the public with a useful distillation of global weather and its impacts. To this end, we present Nested-EAGLE (Experimental Artificial intelligence Global and Limited-area Ensemble): a 0.25{\deg} global weather model with a 6 km refinement over the Contiguous United States (CONUS). The model achieves significantly lower mean-squared error in near-surface and low-level quantities over CONUS compared to NOAA's Global Forecast System and High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR), while remaining competitive throughout the rest of the global atmosphere. We show that the skill gains for near-surface fields stem from incorporating high-resolution regional analysis data into training through the nesting process. Forecasts of precipitation amounts are less skillful than those from HRRR, owing to deterministic training. However, we show that Nested-EAGLE provides the most accurate forecasts of storm locations at longer leads, despite blurred extrema. Our results motivate future work to extend the skill gains beyond CONUS and improve precipitation representation.
Together, WeatherNext 3's capabilities move operational AI-based weather forecasting beyond emulating the traditionally distinct stages of data assimilation, forecasting and post-processing, which helps to further push the frontier of performance and granularity for global weather prediction.
S. Rasp, B. Babenko, Dominic Masters et al.· 3 citations
Atmospheric river (AR)-driven flooding is a natural hazard that causes severe damage in many regions, and the damage escalates sharply once an AR persists beyond a certain duration. Existing studies and numerical weather prediction models, however, have focused mainly on AR occurrence and on the intensity of integrated...
Medium-range weather forecasting underpins operational and planning decisions across the energy industry. Developing competitive weather models was once the domain of national meteorological centers, but recent advances in machine-learned weather prediction (MLWP) have opened the field to industry. We present Aries, a...
Lukas Hedegaard Morsing, A. Bakhtiarnia, J. Olesen et al.· 0 citations
Atmospheric rivers (ARs) produce many of the world's most extreme precipitation events and hydrometeorological hazards. Although artificial intelligence weather prediction (AIWP) models have demonstrated skill comparable to or exceeding numerical weather prediction (NWP) systems for large-scale atmospheric variables, t...
Marina Vicens-Miquel, Taylor Mandelbaum, Amy McGovern et al.· 0 citations
Can probabilistic artificial intelligence (AI) weather forecasts retain skill beyond their training domain? We compare four state-of-the-art AI models (ArchesWeatherGen, U-Cast, WeatherNext2 and GenCast-mini) with the physics-based IFS-ENS over land in 2022, at 1.5{\deg} resolution and lead times of 2--10 days. Monthly...
Bas van Velthoven, Cas Decancq, Diego G. Miralles et al.· 0 citations
AI weather forecasting models are commonly trained on the ERA5 reanalysis, which is unavailable in real time. Operational deployment therefore relies on initial conditions produced by numerical or AI analysis systems that differ from those encountered during training. This mismatch can degrade forecast skill, while ret...
Minseok Seo, Noah D. Brenowitz, Do-Yun Kim et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.