Quantum theory challenges the view that individual measurement outcomes are predefined and independent of the measurement context. Yet the quantum state itself -- the catalogue of probabilities for all possible measurements -- is usually assumed to be well defined. We argue that this assumption tacitly relies on measurements being performed relative to ideal, infinitely-resourceful reference frames. We show that, when measurements are made relative to non-ideal quantum reference frames, the probabilities themselves become indefinite: even in the limit of arbitrarily large number of runs, the relative frequencies may remain uncertain. The uncertainty is irreducible in a quantum-mechanical sense, as we show by proving a Bell-type theorem for relative frequencies. We further propose a quantum-optical implementation of these relational measurements based on pulsed homodyne detection. Our findings motivate an extension of the notion of the quantum state to regimes constrained by finite resources. We expect them to be especially relevant at the interface between quantum theory and general relativity, where the resources and information available in a bounded region of spacetime are fundamentally limited.
In their strongest usage, quantum reference frames have been described as referring to"the measurements performed by a superposed lab","the perspective of a quantum particle","the point of view of a superposed observer", etc. While exciting, these operational proposals have remained brief and ambiguous, leading to misinterpretations and criticism. Here, we provide a detailed specification and defense of the notion of a position-superposed lab or observer. We argue that this requires no exotic claims about quantum physics and raises no greater interpretive difficulty than ordinary quantum measurements. We then derive several consequences of taking this operational meaning seriously. We stress that the position-superposed observers that define quantum references frames are different from, and considerably less problematic than, the outcome-superposed observers considered in Wigners'friend scenarios. In particular, we show that outcomes obtained by a position-superposed observer may (without decohering the superposition) be broadcast to a well-localised one, in contrast with Wigner's friend scenarios, which require the outcomes to remain internal to the system at hand. Finally, we defend the possibility to roleplay a quantum reference frame from a classical reference frame.
This doctoral dissertation on the foundations of quantum theory isolates and then formalizes a physically relevant concept that I have called"Epistemic Constraint."Here, epistemic constraints are the definite, intersubjectively agreeable, ordinary-language conditions under which experiments are described. The usual formulation of the quantum measurement problem, which I call the Schrodingerian measurement problem, has the structure of an anomaly: if we take quantum theory at face value, we expect no definite values, and yet we see definite values in experiments. The responses to this problem have been either to solve it or to dissolve it. These responses, which have taken the form of interpretation, modification, or reconstruction of quantum mechanics, seek either to derive (conceptually or mathematically) epistemic constraints from within quantum mechanics or suitable modifications of it, as is the case with certain interpretations and modifications, or to posit the epistemic constraint, or parts of it, as a primitive assumption with the goal of deriving quantum mechanics, as is the case in some reconstruction programs. In contrast to the Schrodingerian measurement problem, which had the structure of an anomaly, this dissertation develops the Bohrian Program, which (for lack of a better comparison) has a structure similar to the problem historically associated with Euclid's fifth postulate. It seeks to keep epistemic constraints as primitive in an onto-epistemic sense. It then seeks new physical conclusions from the joint consideration of quantum mechanics and epistemic constraints, without seeking to derive one from the other. Among other results, this leads to a notion of the probability of instantiability of the Born Rule that specifies when to apply the Born Rule and when to apply a unitary transformation to a quantum state.
Quantum mechanics is widely recognised as being incomplete. It is not consistent with the second law of thermodynamics and does not provide a scientifically credible physical account of the measurement process, the means by which coherence is broken and classically observable states are recorded. This has led to many ad hoc assumptions being used to account for various properties of quantum systems, among which is the coherence time of quantum devices that determines their ability to perform computations. Here, we show that all these properties can be accommodated naturally and consistently in the context of quantum systems which exhibit continuous spectra, as arises in the thermodynamic limit of large systems. In particular, for isolated systems we show that the time-reversal symmetry associated with unitary time evolution of the quantum state gives rise to time-symmetry breaking and a semi-group evolution which attains thermodynamic equilibrium at long times. Moreover, the emergence of this non-unitary time-asymmetry leads to microcanonical equilibrium states in which all quantum coherence is lost and is accompanied by the transformation of pure states into mixtures, leading in turn to an increase in entropy. Inclusion of a macroscopic measurement apparatus shows how the outcome of a measurement corresponds to the von Neumann projection postulate, arising with probabilities in conformance with the Born rule. The mathematical structure of the theory which applies to quantum systems with continuous spectra is closely analogous to the classical ergodic theory of dynamical systems and the conditions under which they attain equilibrium states.
Quantum metrology promises sensitivity beyond classical strategies, yet it remains unsettled how quantum-enabled precision should scale with physical resources and how to interpret quantum advantage. We provide a physically grounded resource accounting that clarifies the true Heisenberg limit and resolves apparent super-Heisenberg paradoxes. We demonstrate that the Heisenberg limit is best viewed as an information-theoretic manifestation of the quantum speed limit. We illustrate these ideas with a simple, super-resolving phase estimation protocol based on Rabi oscillations in two-level atoms driven on an m-photon resonance. In this setting, the phase error scales as n−m/2, where n is the average photon number. Recasting metrological sensitivity through quantum dynamical speed limits yields operational bounds that reconcile such super-resolution strategies with the standard Heisenberg interpretation and identify the relevant resources in the norm of the generator. We also revisit the common attribution of the NOON state’s 1/n scaling to quantum entanglement. We show that such an attribution is not generic and the Heisenberg 1/n scaling does not, by itself, certify entanglement as the enabling resource.
At one frozen setting, the probabilities observed in a sharp quantum context are indistinguishable, as detector-click statistics, from ordinary probabilities on the atoms of a classical partition. But an actual analyzer usually comes with a calibrated knob: a tangible handle on the apparatus. If the measurement configuration is co-varied continuously through this physical parameter, the operational object is no longer one point of a simplex but a response curve. Classical linear responses, Malus-type Hilbert-space responses, softmax links, non-homomorphic parameter transcriptions, and discontinuous threshold limits are different maps from settings to probabilities. Continuity, calibration, and preservation of the physical composition law are then part of the experimental meaning of the knob. Such comparisons distinguish specified, calibrated response models; by themselves they do not constitute a classical-versus-quantum impossibility theorem. The static operational coincidence can also persist for two intertwined contexts: if the common outcomes receive the same probabilities, the remaining masses can always be coupled by a classical joint distribution. Genuine multi-context nonclassicality begins when a family of local shadows cannot be glued into one nonnegative global distribution or one simplex factorization. Farkas'lemma gives the exact alternative: either the classical extension exists, or a separating linear inequality certifies its impossibility.
Phenomena that slip beyond the grasp of our classical intuition reveal uniquely quantum effects that deepen our understanding of the physical world and enable advances in information processing, particularly in quantum communication and computation. One such phenomenon is quantum steering, whereby measurements performed by one party influence the conditional states of another when the two share an entangled quantum system. If the observed correlations cannot be explained by a local hidden state model, the state is said to be steerable. In this work, we investigate the typicality of this behavior: given a generic two-qubit state and $m$ Haar-random projective measurements, what is the probability of observing steering? We derive analytical expressions for the steering probability $\mathcal{P}_S$ of Werner states in two- and three-setting scenarios, the latter restricted to coplanar projective measurements on the Bloch sphere. For larger numbers of settings and various random states ensembles, we perform numerical analyses showing that $\mathcal{P}_S$ increases systematically with the number of measurements and substantially exceeds the corresponding probabilities associated with Bell nonlocality. Our results demonstrate that random states with minimal environmental coupling exhibit a high probability of steering for finite $m$ and approach genuine typicality, $\mathcal{P}_S=100\%$, as the number of settings increases. We provide a detailed characterization of $\mathcal{P}_S$ across different state ensembles and specific families, including Bell-diagonal and Werner states, identifying those with the greatest non-classical potential and highlighting their relevance for protocols in which steering serves as a key resource.
Gerard Anglès Munné, Paweł Cieśliński, Tamás Vértesi et al.· 0 citations