Local regularization assigns each hypothesis a test-point-dependent score and predicts with a minimum-score hypothesis consistent with the sample consistent with the sample, and this principle characterizes multiclass PAC learnability is negative.
Abstract
Local regularization assigns each hypothesis a test-point-dependent score and predicts with a minimum-score hypothesis consistent with the sample. Asilis et al. asked whether this principle characterizes multiclass PAC learnability. We give a negative answer. There is a countable class of Daniely--Shalev-Shwartz dimension at most two with realizable PAC sample complexity \[ O\!\left(\frac{1}{\varepsilon}\log\frac{1}{\delta}\right), \] that no local regularizer learns. Hypotheses are edges of complete graphs and instances are tournaments. At a test tournament, the scores fix an edge ranking while the training sample independently removes competitors. Cyclic triangles force enough inversions that surviving competitors produce constant population error at arbitrarily large sample sizes.
It is proved that VC classes are adversarially robustly learnable with sample complexity linear in the VC dimension $d$, providing an exponential improvement over the previous upper bound of Montasser, Hanneke, and Srebro (2019).
Worst-case multiclass bounds do not become smaller when the best classifier is already nearly correct: what is missing is an optimistic rate, a guarantee whose fluctuation scales with the oracle risk itself. For a class of Natarajan dimension $d_N$ and Daniely-Shalev-Shwartz dimension $d_{DS}$, the optimal excess risk is known at the two endpoints ($d_{DS}/n$ realizable, $\sqrt{d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n$ agnostic [HMZ24, CEH+26, Pab26]) and open in between. We close the gap: at every fixed oracle risk $L^\star$, the optimal excess risk is $\widetilde{\Theta}(\sqrt{L^\star d_N/n}+d_{DS}/n)$, uniformly in the alphabet size, attained by a learner that knows neither $L^\star$ nor the confidence level. The upper bound composes the cover-menu-compression architecture of [CEH+26], at the realizable rate of [Pab26], with a new comparator-facing relative compression theorem: a size-$k$ compression rule that empirically dominates a comparator $h$ has population risk at most $L(h)+O(\sqrt{L(h)\Gamma}+\Gamma)$ with $\Gamma=(k\log n+\log(1/\delta))/n$, without stability; this transfers the comparison principle of the sharp binary theory [MQZ26] while discarding its Boolean-cube geometry, which does not lift to multiclass labels. The lower bound forces both terms using one class and one distribution at every fixed $L^\star$, by a pair-Assouad scheme calibrated to $L^\star$ and a fiber argument on the pseudo-cubes underlying the Natarajan-versus-DS separation of [BCD+22]. Both theorems extend to list learning: against the best $r$-tuple of hypotheses, the same architecture and the same two engines yield an optimistic rate and a lower bound of the same shape, forcing the fluctuation term that [Pab26] expected to be necessary against list comparators, and removing the factor $r$ from the known realizable list lower bound.
Xiaoyu Li, Andi Han, Jiaojiao Jiang et al.· 1 citation
We study constrained statistical learning over infinite-dimensional hypothesis classes in the fully nonconvex setting, and establish universal PACC learnability of the solutions of dual algorithms: Probably Approximately Correct on Constraints, guaranteeing optimality and constraint satisfaction at once. This strengthens near-PACC results, whose feasibility residual no amount of data can remove. Optimality is caught between generalization, governed by Rademacher complexity and favoring small classes, and strong Lagrangian duality, which rests on Lyapunov convexity for vector measures and needs decomposability, a demand pulling the other way. We reconcile the two by posing the population problem over a universal RKHS $\mathcal{H}_K$, dense in a decomposable envelope, and learning over norm balls of growing radius. This yields the Tikhonov complexity $\mathfrak{T}^{\varepsilon}_{n}$, the least RKHS norm reaching an $\varepsilon$-optimal Lagrangian level set; we prove it finite, obtain exact learnability of the optimal value, and make the sample threshold explicit and polynomial in $1/\varepsilon$ under a source condition. Feasibility is harder: absent convexity the Lagrangian may not attain its infimum, and dual information pins down only an averaged constraint-risk vector, not the risks of any returned predictor. We introduce the closure-realization gap $\varepsilon^\star_\infty$, an index of how well $\mathcal{H}_K$ retrieves feasible solutions from dualization; it is a property of the problem, not of a modeling choice. Learnability is exact when $\varepsilon^\star_\infty=0$, in particular under dual differentiability, and near-PACC with residual exactly $\varepsilon^\star_\infty$ otherwise. Finally, no distribution-free threshold exists already in the unconstrained specialization, so universality is the canonical frame for dual algorithms over large hypothesis classes.
This model shows that adding correctly labeled examples can make learning harder by a logarithmic factor, even for classes that admit finite mistake bounds in online learning.
Infinite-width limits are a standard way to reason about neural networks, but it is not automatic that the limiting learner has the same complexity-theoretic inductive bias as large finite networks. We study this question for Bayesian neural networks at the mean-field, or critical feature-learning, scaling. The central quantity is the \emph{reduced entropy} \[ s_\infty(y,\varepsilon)=\limsup_N -\frac{1}{N}\log \pi_N^0(L\le \varepsilon), \] the intensive prior cost of representing a target function $y$ to population mean-squared error $\varepsilon$. Our main result is a width-robust learnability theorem. At fixed depth, a family of Boolean-cube targets is learnable from polynomially many samples at infinite width if and only if it is learnable at polynomial width, if and only if its reduced entropy is polynomially bounded. Equivalently, up to polynomial slack in accuracy, the Bayesian mean-field learner generalizes exactly on the targets that can be represented by polynomial-size networks. The forward direction is proved by a form of subsampling: from the infinitely many hidden neurons in the mean-field solution, one can select polynomially many representatives and still preserve the learned function on every input simultaneously. At the critical scaling this subsampling has both an ``active''component, which keeps the data-dependent low-dimensional statistics, and a ``lazy''component, which resamples the entropy-dominated directions from the prior. Thus the infinite-width mean-field limit gives a clean analytic description of learning without introducing spurious width-dependent generalization power.
Post-hoc calibration aligns a classifier's predicted confidences with its empirical accuracy without retraining. An ideal calibrator should correct nonlinear miscalibration, scale gracefully to large label spaces, and preserve the original predictions; existing methods typically violate at least one of these properties---temperature scaling lacks expressivity, more flexible parametric alternatives introduce parameters that grow with the number of classes $C$, and other expressive methods do not preserve the rank ordering of class scores and may alter the predicted class. We propose \textbf{Invertible Logits Transformation (InvLT)}, which applies a learned scalar MLP $f:\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ element-wise to the pre-softmax logits. Sharing $f$ across all logit dimensions makes the parameter count independent of $C$. Monotonicity of $f$---and hence preservation of the argmax prediction---is softly encouraged via a paired inverse network rather than enforced through the numerical integration required by prior monotone calibrators; this avoids their computational overhead while empirically preserving the original classification accuracy in every setting we evaluate. Across standard image classification benchmarks and a range of architectures, InvLT consistently outperforms a broad set of post-hoc baselines on standard calibration metrics.