Model Internal State Optimization (MISO), a systems workflow that uses model internal states (MIS), including parameters, activations, gradients, and normalization statistics, to prioritize such local optimization decisions.
Abstract
Ranking models are repeatedly refined within established model families, yet the choice of which component to scale, replace, or retire is often guided by expensive trial-and-error. We present Model Internal State Optimization (MISO), a systems workflow that uses model internal states (MIS), including parameters, activations, gradients, and normalization statistics, to prioritize such local optimization decisions. MISO extracts MIS from a trained ranking model, aggregates them into ranking, alignment, and comparison signals, and converts those signals into a small set of interpretable candidate edits. Because MIS are re-extracted after each retraining cycle, MISO naturally supports an adaptive optimization workflow that tracks evolving model behavior as data distributions and system requirements shift over time. In an ads ranking case study, MISO improves normalized entropy while requiring substantially fewer validation runs than expert-driven and black-box scaling workflows, offering a practical middle ground between manual tuning and opaque automated search.
This survey organizes recent optimizers and training optimization methods along four largely independent axes: temporal estimation, update geometry, horizon management, and representation and systems.
Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures have emerged as a powerful paradigm for scaling model capacity while preserving efficient inference in large foundation models. However, most MoE models use a fixed top-$k$ expert selection policy, assigning the same expert budget to every token even when fewer experts may be sufficient. Inference-time dynamic top-$k$ routing can reduce computation without retraining, but existing methods often overlook the distributional shift caused by deviating from the training-time routing configuration. We show that reducing the number of activated experts consistently increases the RMS scale and variance of SMoE outputs, inducing a representation mismatch that contributes to downstream performance degradation in addition to the loss of expert capacity. To address this correctable component, we propose Layer-wise Distribution Alignment (LDA), a lightweight inference-time correction that uses layer-wise calibration statistics to align reduced-routing representations with the default configuration. Across multiple SMoE LLMs, benchmarks, and routing strategies, LDA recovers much of the performance lost induced by the distributional shift under reduced routing while preserving sparse-inference efficiency with negligible overhead.
Dohyeon Kim, Bedionita Soro, Sung Ju Hwang· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) improves large language model reasoning, but its practical scaling is constrained by expensive on-policy rollouts and the cost of obtaining reliable targets at scale. Existing methods address sample selection, incomplete supervision, or noisy labels separately, often entangling supervision logic with distributed training and hindering controlled comparison and reuse. We present DE-Venus, a unified framework for data-efficient RLVR that treats supervision as evolving state across data preparation and policy optimization. It organizes this lifecycle into three modules: Active Data Selection allocates training and annotation budgets; Weak Supervision Construction derives learning signals from unlabeled examples; and Training-Time Supervision Refinement filters or corrects unreliable supervision. DE-Venus supports seven representative methods and a data-selection pipeline by expressing method-specific decisions as offline dataset transitions or online transformations of targets, rewards, batches, and advantages while preserving verl's distributed execution contracts. Across public benchmarks and three business scenarios, separate configurations preserve or improve model quality with only 10% of labels or as little as 13% of relevant data; selected business configurations also reduce observed convergence steps by 63%--75%. DE-Venus thus reduces annotation and training costs without sacrificing scalable RL execution.
Shen-Zhi Yang, Guang-Cheng Zhu, Kai Tang et al.· 0 citations
Results show that multi-objective Bayesian optimization is valuable as a search layer for expressive merge parameterizations in model merging and introduce MOBO-Merge, a merge-operator agnostic framework that uses multi-objective Bayesian optimization to approximate the Pareto front under a limited evaluation budget.
Utkarsh Agarwal, V. Bonagiri, Raul Astudillo et al.· 0 citations
Experiments show that DIAG boosts yield across iterations and delivers stronger reasoning performance under an iso-effective training budget, demonstrating that it can distill more informative preference supervision for mathematical reasoning.
Guhan Chen, Songtao Tian, Bo-Han Li et al.· 0 citations
Modern industrial ads ranking stacks are increasingly bottlenecked not by model capacity or training compute, but by the throughput of human ML iteration - the cycles of research, implementation, training, debugging, evaluation, and launch required to surface a single statistically significant improvement. A typical ranking stack contains numerous differentiated models with heterogeneous data, architectures, and infrastructure constraints, and each cycle takes days to weeks of senior engineer attention per model. As a result, techniques that have proven effective on one model diffuse into others slowly and unevenly, leaving substantial recoverable signal unexplored. We present Agentic ML Exploration (A-MLE), an autonomous LLM-agent system that systematically explores ML techniques across a portfolio of ads ranking models. A-MLE decomposes ML iteration into five stages involving hypothesis generation, exploration strategy, experiment execution, result analysis and shared knowledge substrate which are orchestrated by a single agent that invokes domain-specific skills and agentic workflows against a sandboxed execution layer, with human-in-the-loop checkpoints at each stage boundary. We deploy A-MLE across a representative set of large-scale ads ranking models and evaluate it along a tiered capability framework (tool availability, autonomous workflow execution, and open-ended exploration). We further report a controlled cross-LLM study using a fixed agent loop, which surfaces qualitative differences in execution reliability and exploration aggressiveness across the Claude Sonnet, Gemini, and GPT families. We discuss failure modes and the design choices that govern reliability. Our findings suggest that agentic exploration is a practical force multiplier for ML engineers in industrial recommenders, especially for the long tail of models that rarely receive expert attention.
