Skip to content
Conference

Construction of Machine Self-Awareness in Embodied Intelligence

Jul 2026 · 2026 IEEE 27th China Conference on System Simulation Technology and its Applications (CCSSTA) · pp. 383-389 · 0 citations · 22 references

Abstract

Machine self-awareness remains a central but un-resolved challenge in embodied intelligence. Existing artificial intelligence systems are largely built on an outside-in paradigm, in which external sensory data are processed into task-oriented outputs. Although such systems can support perception, prediction, and control, they lack an internally grounded mechanism for distinguishing self-generated change from environmental disturbance. This paper proposes an inside-out developmental framework for constructing machine self-awareness. Drawing on embodied cognition, the C0–C2 hierarchy of consciousness, the efference copy mechanism, and the Free Energy Principle, the framework argues that self-awareness should emerge through repeated cycles of motor intention, predictive modeling, sensory feedback, and prediction-error correction. At the core of this process is the formation of a stable self/environment boundary, defined not by anatomical limits but by the coherence of predictive control. The paper develops an eight-stage model that begins with un-conscious information processing, progresses through efference-copy-based sensorimotor calibration and boundary formation, and extends toward global integration, spatial cognition, active perception, and metacognitive self-monitoring. To illustrate this developmental logic, the paper introduces The Chrysalis of Self, a 2D interactive prototype that simulates mirror-test recognition and spatial memory exploration. The prototype is presented as a pedagogical demonstration rather than an empirical validation. The paper further discusses architectural implications, including the limitations of digital twins, the possibility of tool-based extended selfhood, and the need for multi-criteria evaluation combining structural, boundary, and metacognitive evidence. Overall, this work argues that machine self-awareness cannot be externally assigned; it must be progressively constructed through embodied action, prediction, and feedback.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.