Skip to content

DNA Language Models: An Assessment of Pre-Training for Fine-Tuning Tasks

Jun 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2606.30140 · 0 citations · 13 references
Biology Computer Science

TL;DR

This work investigates three key questions: do transformer-based models provide sufficient improvements on fine-tuning tasks upon heavy pretraining, what is the actual contribution of pretraining in this setting, and how does BPE tokenization impact performance on genomics-related tasks.

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in foundation models and Large Language Models (LLMs) have introduced new opportunities for studying and decoding genomic sequences. Several state-of-the-art approaches, such as DNABERT2, rely on transformer-based architectures, while others, such as ConvNova, still build upon more conventional convolutional models. However, systematic benchmark comparisons across these methods remain scarce. Given that transformer-based models require extensive and costly pretraining, it is crucial to evaluate whether their performance gains justify this overhead. Moreover, LLMs such as DNABERT2 typically rely on Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenization, whose relevance for DNA sequence representation is still debated within the genomics community. In this work, we investigate three key questions: (i) do transformer-based models provide sufficient improvements on fine-tuning tasks upon heavy pretraining, (ii) what is the actual contribution of pretraining in this setting, and (iii) how does BPE tokenization impact performance on genomics-related tasks?

View source

Similar papers

Review Open access Jan 2024

Advancing bioinformatics with language models: components, applications, and perspectives

This review provides a comprehensive overview of transformer-based model applications in genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, drug discovery, drug discovery, and single-cell analysis, and highlights major challenges that remain insufficiently addressed in prior reviews.

Jiajia Liu, Mengyuan Yang, Yankai Yu et al. · 41 citations · ⚡4
#artificial intelligence Review Open access Nov 2026

A comparative review of modern large language model paradigms: GPT-4, BERT, Gemini, and DeepSeek

Comparison of GPT-4, BERT (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers), Gemini, and DeepSeek large language models (LLM), focusing on architectures, training methodologies, and real-world applications reveals GPT-4 excels in natural language generation and complex reasoning, supporting up to 128K tokens with moderate latency and higher costs making it effective for conversational artificial intelligence (AI).

Kavish Sanghvi, Aparna S. Sharma, Surbhi Hooda · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Pretraining Enhances Megabase-Scale Gene Expression Prediction with GeneUnet

Predicting gene expression from DNA sequence across diverse genomic tracks is essential for understanding gene regulation and interpreting non-coding variants. Existing supervised methods are limited to few species and fail to exploit conserved regulatory mechanisms, while DNA foundation models capture cross-species information but remain constrained to kilobase-scale contexts insufficient for this task. Here we introduce GB.GeneUnet, an 837M-parameter transformer-based U-Net pretrained on 6 trillion tokens from multi-species genomes in OpenGenome2, extending genomic context to 1 Mb with up to 100× inference speedup over GeneMoE, a preliminary MoE transformer baseline of similar model size pretrained on the same data. Fine-tuned for gene expression prediction, GB.GeneUnet achieves state-of-the-art performance on the Borzoi benchmark at 524 kb context, and attains performance comparable to AlphaGenome at 1 Mb context while requiring a lighter fine-tuning procedure. Together, these results establish a scalable framework linking multi-species pretraining to ultra-long-context gene expression modeling.

Ning Sun, William de Vazelhes, Pan Li et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Jul 2026

Alignment Is All You Need: Instruction-Free Training for General Audio-Language Models

The results suggest that competitive MLLM can emerge from alignment alone, reducing multimodal extension to a lightweight projector-training problem that generalizes across modalities and adapts rapidly to each new LLM release.

Xuanru Zhou, Yiwen Shao, Jiahong Li et al. · 1 citation
#machine learning Preprint Aug 2026

TokEval: A Tokenizer Evaluation Suite

Language model tokenizers are typically selected with minimal evaluation, despite the fact that their design choices directly impact model capabilities. This can be partly attributed to a limited understanding of which tokenizer properties affect which aspects of downstream performance. We introduce TokEval, a framework of tokenizer evaluation metrics that goes beyond standard measures like fertility and compression rate to capture linguistically and structurally meaningful properties, e.g., UTF-8 character boundary integrity and digit place-value boundary alignment for mathematics. To validate whether these metrics are predictive of downstream model performance, we conduct controlled language model pretraining experiments, varying solely the tokenizers'training data mixture, pretokenization strategy, and training algorithm. We evaluate the resulting models on bits-per-byte (a tokenizer-agnostic version of perplexity) and several benchmarks, spanning linguistic understanding, mathematical reasoning, and code generation. Our experiments suggest that different intrinsic properties have different impacts on model abilities: information-theoretic metrics predict language modeling abilities (Spearman rho up to 0.80), while structure-sensitive metrics, such as those measuring digit and line-break handling, correlate with task accuracy. We hope TokEval enables more principled tokenizer evaluation, replacing pretraining sweeps with intrinsic measurement wherever the two agree.

Clara Meister · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Frozen but Not Always Accessible: A Representation Analysis of Genomic Language Models

Genomic foundation models are increasingly reused as frozen feature extractors for downstream sequence prediction, offering a compute-efficient alternative to full fine-tuning. However, it remains unclear when biological information encoded by these models is accessible without task-specific adaptation. We present a representation-accessibility analysis of frozen genomic language models across regulatory, epigenetic, promoter, splice-site, and variant-effect prediction tasks. We evaluate DNABERT-2, Nucleotide Transformer, HyenaDNA, GENERATOR-v2, and Omni-DNA under unified frozen-probing protocols, while separating diagnostic readout analyses from validation-selected checks. Our results reveal a consistent task-dependent pattern: frozen probes recover 95-100 % of fine-tuned performance on promoter tasks, but average splice-site recovery drops to 60-88 %. Frozen embeddings are also competitive on broad Genomic Benchmark tasks such as coding-region and species-discrimination classification, but show larger gaps on some regulatory and OCR tasks. Layer-wise probing, in-silico mutagenesis, variant-effect prediction, and embedding geometry show that local biological signal is partially present in frozen representations, but is not always accessible through final pooled embeddings.

Nirjhor Datta, Swakkhar Shatabda, M. S. Rahman · 0 citations