This work presents a resource-aware scheduler for DQC that compares these execution alternatives at runtime using explicit models of QPU execution, communication, and host-side reconstruction, together with hardware-informed timing derived from simulated IBM QPUs.
Abstract
Distributed quantum computing (DQC) is a promising near-term approach for executing circuits that exceed the capacity of a single quantum processing unit (QPU). Prior work has made significant progress on circuit partitioning and reconstruction, but practical DQC requires more than cutting a circuit into smaller pieces. A runtime system must determine whether to execute the circuit intact, cut it for sequential execution on one QPU, or distribute it across multiple QPUs, while accounting for queueing, communication, reconstruction, and hardware constraints. We present a resource-aware scheduler for DQC that compares these execution alternatives at runtime using explicit models of QPU execution, communication, and host-side reconstruction, together with hardware-informed timing derived from simulated IBM QPUs. By treating communication and reconstruction as first-class scheduling costs, the scheduler selects execution plans using a more realistic view of end-to-end overhead than cutting-only approaches. Across our experiments, reconstruction accounts for over 83% of cutting overhead, distributed execution reduces P90 latency by up to 39% relative to uncut single-QPU execution, and scheduling overhead itself remains negligible, never exceeding 0.038% of end-to-end job latency. Together, these results show that DQC must be treated as a runtime scheduling problem over both quantum and classical resources, not just circuit partitioning.
This work forms the joint selection of compilations and allocation of shots under per-link Bell-pair capacities as Candidate-Constrained Max-Shot Allocation (CMA), proves it NP-hard, and solves it with a dynamic program and its approximate variant AppDP, a compact MILP, and a greedy heuristic Effi.
Yi-Pei Liu, Sen Zhang, Ze-Bo Yang et al.· 0 citations
Multi-quantum processing unit (multi-QPU) architectures have emerged as a promising route for scaling up quantum computing. However, quantum circuit execution across QPUs introduces remote operations, which have lower fidelity than local operations and require additional communication resources. Circuit mapping, which...
Long-Shan Xu, E. Sha, Wei-Xuan Liu et al.· Quantum Science and Technolo...· 0 citations
Distributed quantum computing (DQC) connects multiple quantum processing units to overcome the scale limits of monolithic hardware. We introduce SeQUeNCe$.$DQC a new top-level module within the SeQUeNCe package that compiles monolithic circuits into topology-aware execution plans and coordinates their execution using S...
S. Suresh, Cai-Tao Zhan, Joaquin Chung et al.· 0 citations
Cloud-accessible quantum computing has made heterogeneous Quantum Processing Units (QPUs) available through provider platforms that differ in qubit technology, calibration state, queueing behavior, and pricing model. This heterogeneity makes execution management a quantum-engineering concern: a quantum circuit may be e...
Giuseppe Bisicchia, A. Bocci, José García-Alonso et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that the best-performing compilation strategy varies across the tested circuits and network configurations, and that both network topology and intra-QPU connectivity substantially affect the entanglement cost of execution.
Luke Andreesen, Shobhit Gupta, Sean E. Sullivan et al.· 0 citations
Distributed quantum computing distributes workloads that exceed a single processor's capacity across resource-constrained components. Circuit cutting enables this decomposition, but its effectiveness depends on partition choice. We present SACE, a Simulation-Aware Circuit Partitioning framework with Entanglement-Capabi...
Wei-Dong Liu, Qing-Qing Jiang, Yu-Fu Liu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.