Aug 2026· Measurement Science Review· Vol 26, pp. 219 - 223· 0 citations· 19 references
TL;DR
This review summarizes current knowledge on neuroimaging data harmonization, inter-scanner variability, radiomic feature repeatability, standardized QA procedures, and the challenges associated with integrating artificial intelligence into clinical workflows to highlight the need for unified methodologies, transparent protocols, and robust validation frameworks for reliable clinical translatability of MRI.
Abstract
Abstract Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most important imaging modalities in clinical diagnostics and biomedical research; however, its usability is significantly limited by the high technical and methodological variability across sites, scanners, and acquisition protocols. This lack of uniformity affects quantitative measurements, reduces their reproducibility, and complicates multicenter studies. In recent years, numerous initiatives and technical approaches have emerged, focusing on acquisition standardization, data harmonization, signal quality assessment, and validation of quantitative methods. This review summarizes current knowledge on neuroimaging data harmonization (e.g., ComBat), inter-scanner variability, radiomic feature repeatability, standardized QA procedures, and the challenges associated with integrating artificial intelligence into clinical workflows. Metrological frameworks such as the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) further emphasize the need for clearly defined measurands, reference methods, and reproducible acquisition conditions. Special attention is given to large dataset initiatives, preclinical standardization platforms, and open tools for MRI quality assessment. The review highlights the need for unified methodologies, transparent protocols, and robust validation frameworks that are essential for the reliable clinical translatability of MRI.
Despite ongoing challenges related to standardization, acquisition time, multicenter reproducibility, and clinical implementation, quantitative MRI is expected to become an integral component of routine musculoskeletal and neuroimaging practice.
Shubhanshi Rani, Vijay Kishor Chakravarti, Anjali Raghav et al.· Genetics and Molecular Resea...· 0 citations
In the future, MRI is expected to achieve breakthroughs by combining artificial intelligence, developing new contrast agents, and upgrading hardware, further expanding its applications in the medical field.
Jun-Wen Chen, Xin-Yi Liu, Yanghongyu Qian et al.· 0 citations
The authors detail metrics of MRI quality-contrast-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio-along with the impact of key technical parameters on acquisition time and step-by-step guidance for improving image quality.
Jérémy Dana, E. McNabb, Véronique Fortier et al.· Radiographics· 0 citations
Qualitative similarities between volume measurements in adults and the questions of reproducibility through test-retest reliability and external validity using recent software updates to the Hyperfine Swoop system constitute a crucial foundation for the clinical utility of 64 mT MRI in monitoring brain volume loss over...
M. Stockbridge, Rex Wang, V. Neal et al.· Aperture Neuro· 0 citations
Multi-site data collection enables the aggregation of large and diverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets, which are essential for development of robust machine learning (ML) models in neuroimaging. However, site-related variability introduced by differences in scanner equipment and acquisition protocols (i.e....
Vilmos Madaras, Z. Vidnyánszky, Béla Weiss· International Conference on...· 0 citations
Accelerated 2D DL, 3D Cube, and 3D qDESS protocols demonstrated diagnostic agreement and diagnostic image quality comparable to the conventional knee MRI protocol while reducing scan time to ~ 6 min.
Ananya Goyal, J. MacKay, M. Petterson et al.· Skeletal Radiology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.