Evidence-First Reflection (EFR), a two-stage reflector that explicitly decouples action-induced visual differences extraction from outcome verification, makes reflection better grounded in screen transitions, while reducing both visual search complexity and reasoning burden.
Abstract
The Planner-Operator-Reflector (POR) framework is widely used in GUI agents to maintain objective alignment in complex tasks through modular collaboration. However, desktop GUIs introduce a key challenge: large, dense interfaces often exhibit subtle or scattered state changes, placing most of the burden on the reflector, which must compare pre- and post-action screens, while the planner and operator reason over a single state. Existing reflectors collapse change detection and outcome verification into one step, leaving evidence implicit and yielding weakly grounded decisions. To address this limitation, we propose Evidence-First Reflection (EFR), a two-stage reflector that explicitly decouples action-induced visual differences extraction from outcome verification. EFR identifies the action location and candidate changed regions with Set-of-Marks annotations, describes and filters action-relevant changes, and makes the final judgment from the cleaned evidence. This evidence-reasoning decoupled design makes reflection better grounded in screen transitions, while reducing both visual search complexity and reasoning burden. Experiments on OSWorld-Verified and WindowsAgentArena demonstrate that EFR improves reflector accuracy by 7.11%, yielding average end-to-end task success gains of 5.94% and 4.95% on the two benchmarks, respectively.
StepReflect is proposed, which formulates per-step GUI reflection as supervised structured prediction conditioned on explicit transition specifications and paired visual evidence, and established as a practical, locally deployable alternative to repeated frontier-model reflection for long-horizon mobile GUI agents.
Humans can perform complex manipulations given a simple intent through an overall instruction, while continuously adapting to evolving visual observations. However, current vision-language action (VLA) models and other action policies struggle to realize this high-level intelligent behavior under dense, evolving visual inputs and sparse language guidance. Visual correlations can then dominate semantic intent, leading actions to follow visual shortcuts rather than human goals. We present HINT (Human-INTent INcepTion), an agentic framework inspired by the human manipulation principles: semantic intent changes sparsely at manipulation-pattern transitions, whereas continuous control primarily depends on the evolving object-hand relationship. HINT invokes semantic reasoning only at pattern transitions to resolve the current subtask and target, then maintains this commitment through multi-view grounding and visual tracking. We explore two visual interfaces-image-space semantic highlighting and attention-prior injection-to communicate the tracked intent to the action policy without introducing additional trainable parameters into the foundation action model. Experiments across three long-horizon tasks and out-of-distribution variants show that HINT substantially improves intent understanding, task progress, and end-to-end success across two foundation policies while preserving low-latency control. Project page: https://robot-hint.github.io/
Mingyu Mei, Haojie Xu, Shi-Hao Jin et al.· 0 citations
RegulAR models task instructions as a hierarchical dependency graph and combines this structure with a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) to interpret egocentric observations during execution and enables RegulAR to track progress, identify deviations by error type, estimate their impact on later steps, and deliver appropriately salient interventions through an in-situ head-up display that visualizes task state and recovery guidance.
Yi-Lin Ye, Jindu Wang, Hiu-Tung Wong et al.· 0 citations
Evaluation is shifting from static QA toward agentic settings where models act through external tools. We identify a critical yet underexplored capability within this space - dexterous visual tool use: fine-grained, closed-loop parameterized visual action in which models infer tool parameters from visual evidence, and those parameters directly govern the final result. Existing benchmarks cover web navigation, GUI operation, and software engineering, but rarely target this coupling between visual evidence and execution precision. We propose EASEL, a benchmark evaluating a controlled instance of dexterous visual tool use that adopts reference-guided visual reconstruction as its primary proxy task: the agent incrementally paints a canvas to match a reference image. EASEL additionally includes semantic tasks spanning region annotation, handwriting, and path planning. We further provide EASEL-Data, a 440k-sample two-stage curriculum dataset for trajectory supervision, and EASEL-9B to investigate its effect on this capability. Evaluation of 25 models reveals that current multimodal agents systematically struggle on EASEL. Reconstruction similarity bottlenecks at low levels (0.40-0.54), while trajectory diagnostics expose severe closed-loop instability - models typically saturate early or degrade post-peak. Semantic tasks reveal sharp capability boundaries in precision annotation and path planning. EASEL-9B, trained on EASEL-Data, surpasses the base model by a relative 6.3%, ranking third among all evaluated models.
Shudong Liu, Dong-Yang Chen, En-Ci Zhang et al.· 0 citations
GUI agents increasingly operate across websites, mobile apps, and desktop environments, yet the field still reports progress primarily through task success. We argue that practical deployment depends equally on efficiency: how much context, computation, action budget, and runtime overhead an agent consumes while succeeding. This survey studies efficient GUI agents through an end-to-end systems lens that preserves the current technical axes of observation efficiency, context and memory efficiency, action efficiency, and planner-side/system efficiency. For each subsection, we expand the seed literature through targeted search plus backward and forward citation chaining, then synthesize the dominant mechanisms, reported efficiency signals, and new overheads they introduce. Across the literature, recent progress converges on a small set of recurring ideas: selective reading instead of full-context ingestion, global-to-local visual allocation, recoverable memory rather than raw history replay, verification-aware control, and hybrid runtimes that can switch between GUI and non-GUI execution. We conclude by identifying the main open problems, including honest accounting of verifier cost, cross-benchmark comparability, and co-design of observation, memory, and execution layers under real latency and privacy constraints.
Bizhe Bai, Jiakang Yuan, Hong-Zhou Wu et al.· 0 citations
GUI agents are commonly trained offline from successful interaction trajectories. Standard training decomposes each trajectory into prefix-action pairs: the agent predicts an action from the current screen and interaction history, while the subsequent observation is discarded. This removes the rationale of why an action is correct: the evidence often appears only on the subsequent screen. For example, to enable Soft Wrap, the agent should click Edit or View, but nothing reveals this until the menu opens. Without such evidence, standard imitation gives the model little chance of ever sampling and thus learning the correct reasoning. To address this issue, we propose Gated Hindsight Distillation (GHD), which uses the next screenshot as privileged information during training. A student predicts from the observable trajectory prefix, while a parameter-sharing teacher additionally observes the next screenshot and re-scores the student's on-policy responses. We apply distillation only when the student fails and the hindsight-conditioned teacher recovers the demonstrated action. GHD improves task success over GRPO on AndroidWorld and AndroidLab across two vision-language models. The code and checkpoints will be made available.
Weiwei Li, Junzhuo Liu, Tong Chu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
