Skip to content
Review Open access

Prospects for integrating artificial intelligence into the practice of gastroenterologists and hepatologists

Oct 2026 · Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council · 0 citations · 77 references

Abstract

Introduction. Artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical practice refers to a set of digital analysis methods capable of performing tasks that typically require a physician's involvement. Unlike conventional medical software, AI algorithms process vast amounts of historical health data to identify patterns and apply them to analyze new data. Sought-after technologies in this field include machine learning, neural network-based deep learning (DL), and large language models (LLMs). Aim. To evaluate the potential and limitations of AI technologies in gastroenterological practice and to explore their contribution to the optimization and enhancement of the quality of clinical decision-making. Materials and methods . A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, eLIBRARY.RU, and Google Scholar databases was conducted for the period from 2021 to August 2026. A total of 204 papers were evaluated, and 97 were included in the review. The search terms were as follows: artificial intelligence, machine learning, deep learning, neural networks, large language models, clinical practice, medical diagnostics, multi-criteria decision analysis, explainable artificial intelligence. A supplementary manual search of the reference lists of relevant reviews was conducted. Results. AI systems can analyze diagnostic images, predict disease outcomes, and computerize document processing. Algorithm training replicates clinical experience: the model can acquire differential diagnosis skills by analyzing endoscopic images. LLMs structure electronic health record (EHR) data and support differential diagnosis. MCDA takes into account patients’ quality of life, their individual characteristics, resource constraints, clinical priorities, and prognosis of the individual course of disease. At the same time, AI lacks clinical reasoning and causal reasoning capabilities; performance of AI models is determined by AI training data quality. Conclusion. AI technologies in healthcare serve as supportive tools for physicians that aid, rather than replace, the clinical reasoning of clinicians and other healthcare professionals. Mandatory validation of the scope and efficacy of AI solutions in accordance with established methodological and regulatory requirements will become a reliable basis for their integration into gastroenterologal practice and medical care standards.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.