Satisfaction and Quality of Life After Septorhinoplasty: Comparing Outcomes in Posttraumatic and Nontraumatic Cases Using the FACE-Q and NOSE Questionnaire
Abstract
Abstract Background Functional septorhinoplasty (fSRP) aims to improve both nasal function and patient satisfaction. Objectives This study compared postoperative satisfaction, nasal function, and quality of life after fSRP between patients with and without a history of nasal trauma using validated patient-reported outcome measures. Methods A cross-sectional cohort of 71 patients (22 posttraumatic, 49 nontraumatic) who underwent fSRP between 2020 and 2024 at a tertiary referral center completed the Facial Assessment and Cosmetic Enhancement Quality of Life Questionnaire (FACE-Q), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation scale (NOSE), and World Health Organization Quality of Life—BREF questionnaire. Patients were grouped by history of nasal trauma, and multivariate linear regression was performed to assess factors influencing satisfaction and nasal function. Results Patients with a history of nasal trauma reported significantly higher satisfaction on FACE-Q subscales “satisfaction with nose” (β = 12.12, P = .037) and “satisfaction with nostrils” (β = 17.01, P = .033) compared with nontrauma patients. Participants in a relationship scored higher on the subscales “satisfaction with nose” and “satisfaction with facial appearance” (βadjusted = 13.47, P = .005 and βadjusted = 11.80, P = .005, respectively). Smokers reported significantly higher nasal obstruction symptoms (β = 23.97, P = .002) on the NOSE scale. No significant difference in functional outcomes (NOSE score) was found between trauma and nontrauma groups. Conclusions In this cohort, a history of nasal trauma and being in a relationship were associated with higher postoperative FACE-Q scores following fSRP. Individuals with previous nasal trauma reported greater satisfaction with their nose and nostrils, whereas those in a relationship demonstrated higher satisfaction with both their nose and overall facial appearance. Level of Evidence 3 (Therapeutic)For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.