Tx2Mol is presented, a transcriptome-guided framework that translates gene-expression signatures into candidate molecules while maintaining biological guidance throughout generation and support gene-expression phenotypes as actionable guidance signals for phenotype-directed molecular design and candidate prioritization.
Abstract
Target-based and structure-guided drug design remain central to modern drug discovery, but complementary strategies are needed when predefined targets or binding pockets do not fully capture disease biology. Gene-expression signatures provide scalable system-level readouts of disease and perturbation states, making them attractive inputs for phenotype-guided molecular design. However, preserving phenotypic information during molecular generation remains challenging, and chemically plausible molecules may lose connection to the intended biological response. Here, we present Tx2Mol, a transcriptome-guided framework that translates gene-expression signatures into candidate molecules while maintaining biological guidance throughout generation. We evaluated Tx2Mol across three biological settings: bulk gene perturbation, single-cell perturbation, and patient-derived disease signatures; and three validation dimensions: chemical plausibility, structural compatibility, and phenotypic preservation. Across 10 cancer-relevant bulk gene-perturbation benchmarks, Tx2Mol outperformed 9 transcriptome-guided baselines, improving maximum Tanimoto similarity to known ligands by 24.10% on average and by 50.67% on HDAC1. Structure-based analyses further supported structurally novel candidates with favorable predicted target binding. Tx2Mol also generalized to noisy single-cell perturbation profiles and preserved drug-induced transcriptional responses through in silico drug-perturbation validation. Patient-derived disease signatures further guided molecular generation toward approved-drug chemical space. Together, these results support gene-expression phenotypes as actionable guidance signals for phenotype-directed molecular design and candidate prioritization.
Gene expression profiles capture system-level drug responses and offer a promising basis for de novo molecular generation. However, their application is limited by data sparsity and experimental noise, which hinder the reliable mapping between disease-associated transcriptomic perturbations and chemically valid therape...
Zhi-Kang Yuan, Xin Zhang, Gao-Ming Lin et al.· PLoS Computational Biology· 0 citations
Single-cell drug perturbation models are increasingly used to predict how compounds remodel cellular states, but they are still largely assessed by expression reconstruction. Whether high expression similarity reflects preservation of drug-response signatures remains unclear. Here we present scDrugPerturb-Bench, a mech...
Perturb-ME, along with agentic interpretation, provide a scalable framework for comprehensive functional discovery from phenotype-enriched genetic screens and combines genome-scale CRISPR screening, phenotype-based enrichment and multimodal single-cell profiling.
Han-Chen Wang, Jiacheng Gu, Chris J. Frangieh et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
LGR5 expression defines a colorectal cancer subset that is pharmacologically tractable despite the absence of genetic dependency, including condensate-directed modulation of NKD1 as a route to targets inaccessible by antibody- or pocket-based approaches.
Lucía Paniagua-Herranz, A. Feito, Cristian Privat et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
This PTM-centered integrative framework delineates metabolic and immune remodeling in melanoma, establishes an interpretable prognostic model, and identifies candidate therapeutic vulnerabilities for precision oncology.
Man-Ning Wu, Dong-Mei Zhou, Yue-Min Zou et al.· Clinical, Cosmetic and Inves...· 0 citations
It is demonstrated that integrated Perturb-seq experiments spanning diverse contexts enable hypotheses about gene function specific to tissue types or cancer subtypes – suggesting large-scale, genome-wide datasets would offer invaluable insight into the highly context-dependent nature of cancer biology.
Samuel Maffa, Isabella A. Boyle, Lie Ward et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.