Skip to content
Open access

Eating detection from smartwatch sensors under subject-independent validation

Oct 2026 · European Journal of Public Health · Vol 36 · 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Accurate dietary assessment is essential for preventing non-communicable diseases, yet self-reported methods are unreliable. Wearable devices offer a scalable alternative, but most studies rely on research-grade sensors and within-subject validation, leading to overoptimistic results. Methods We evaluated the ability of a commercial smartwatch (Garmin Fenix 5) to detect eating episodes using accelerometer and orientation data. Twenty healthy adults were recorded during four standardized meals in semi-naturalistic settings. Data were segmented into time windows and transformed into statistical features. Multiple machine learning and deep learning models were trained and evaluated using Leave-One-Subject-Out cross-validation to ensure subject-independent performance. Results A total of 26,304 observations from 19 participants were analyzed. The best-performing model (tuned XGBoost) achieved a balanced accuracy of 0.642 (95% CI 0.612–0.671) and AUC of 0.712 (0.671–0.749). Simpler models, including logistic regression, showed comparable performance. A Transformer model achieved the highest sensitivity (0.691 [0.637–0.735]) but with reduced specificity (0.504 [0.456–0.549]). Substantial inter-subject variability was observed, with sensitivity ranging widely across individuals. Conclusions Eating detection using commercial smartwatch sensors remains challenging under realistic subject-independent validation. Performance is lower than previously reported studies using less rigorous designs, highlighting the importance of proper validation. High inter-individual variability limits generalizability, suggesting that personalization and larger datasets are necessary for real-world deployment. Key messages • Commercial smartwatches can detect eating episodes, but performance drops under subject-independent validation, highlighting real-world limitations. • High inter-individual variability limits generalizability; personalization and larger datasets are essential for reliable dietary monitoring with wearables.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.