Benefits and Obstacles of Implementing Circularity by Construction Sector Companies in the West Pomeranian Voivodeship of Poland

Abstract

The construction sector has a significant impact on natural resources consumption and waste generation. In accordance with circular economy principles, the adoption of secondary materials, encompassing both reused and recycled components, by construction companies is of increasing strategic importance, especially in cities and their surrounding areas. However, enterprises in this sector continue to face substantial challenges related to implementation of these materials. The article aims to investigate the opinions of representatives of companies operating in the construction sector in the West Pomeranian Voivodeship of Poland regarding the benefits and obstacles associated with the implementation of secondary materials, as well as to identify measures that could contribute to the wider use of these materials in practice. The study was conducted using a diagnostic survey method based on computer-assisted web interviews. The sample comprised 46 respondents from the West Pomeranian Voivodeship of Poland. The analysis of the collected opinions emphasized that waste reduction, protection of the environment and natural resources are perceived as the most significant benefits. Among the main obstacles to implement these materials, respondents highlighted the lack of specialized platforms for secondary materials trading, difficulties in materials sorting, including construction and demolition waste, as well as complex bureaucratic procedures. In the respondents’ opinion, the measures crucial for facilitating the use of secondary materials include the development of legislation enabling the reclassification of waste as secondary construction materials, ensuring reliable access to these materials, and providing government support. It was revealed that despite broad recognition of environmental benefits, the primary obstacle is the absence of an effective marketplace for secondary materials, pointing to a crucial role for institutional intervention. Recommendations for companies’ managers from the construction sector, designers and local policymakers were proposed.