Thirty pathology-specific and general-purpose foundation models are benchmarked through 304,920 runs across spatial readouts, magnifications, taxonomic granularities, and evaluation protocols, yielding distinct multidimensional capability profiles.
Abstract
Pathology foundation models (PFMs) are increasingly used as general-purpose backbones, yet existing benchmarks cannot systematically diagnose their whole-slide cellular representation capabilities, including the decodability of cell-type information and the transferability of such information across tissue sections, datasets, and anatomical organs. We introduce CellPath-Bench, a cellular-resolution benchmark that evaluates frozen PFMs themselves. Following quality control of 52 candidate Xenium datasets, we construct a panel of 25 spatially aligned H\&E--Xenium tissue sections spanning 11 organs and 7,079,283 cells, harmonized into fine- and coarse-grained taxonomies. CellPath-Bench samples frozen WSI feature maps at registered nuclear coordinates and evaluates them using standardized multiclass linear probes. Cell Representation Advantage (CRA) measures the within-section advantage of nucleus-anchored representations over patch-level mean pooling, while Cell Representation Transferability (CRT) characterizes the generalization of cell-type decodability across tissue sections, datasets, and organs. We benchmark 30 pathology-specific and general-purpose foundation models through 304,920 runs across spatial readouts, magnifications, taxonomic granularities, and evaluation protocols. The results reveal substantial model-dependent differences in cell-type decodability and its cross-domain generalization, yielding distinct multidimensional capability profiles. CellPath-Bench provides a standardized framework for auditing cellular information in frozen PFM representations.
Identifying cell types directly from routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) histology would enable single-cell analysis at scale, but training such models has relied on manual pathologist annotations, which are slow, expensive and unreliable for many cell types. We instead supervise morphology with molecules. Imaging-bas...
This work introduces CytoGate-Bench, a benchmark that reformulates this per-step procedure as a zero-shot, panel-agnostic task for large language models, and contributes a public benchmark that tests precisely that ability across 11 human cohorts.
Jaesik Kim, Byounghan Lee, Namhyuk Ahn et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Vision Transformers (ViTs) and their hierarchical variants have achieved strong performance in Computational Pathology (CPath). However, most are pre-trained on single-resolution Whole Slide Images (WSIs), limiting their generalization across arbitrary resolutions. Gigapixel WSIs inherently contain diagnostic patterns...
B. Alawode, Moshira Abdalla, Dwarikanath Mahapatra et al.· 0 citations
Pathology foundation models trained from whole-slide images alone treat tissue morphology as an autonomous visual phenotype, leaving learned representations only weakly anchored to the molecular processes that generate tissue architecture. Here we present Fuji, a multimodal pathology foundation model that grounds morph...
Q. Li, J. Sang, Yiwei Xiao et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
This study establishes pathoentity shuffling as an effective principle for pathological image analysis, bridging biological insight and computational design to enhance diagnostic modeling and morphological hierarchy learning.
Zeyu Liu, Tianyi Zhang, Brian K. Chen et al.· npj Biomedical Innovations· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.