Skip to content
Review Open access

A Comprehensive Survey on AI-Driven Financial Fraud Detection: Trends, Techniques, and Future Directions

Jul 2026 · FinTech and Sustainable Innovation · 0 citations · 122 references

TL;DR

This review provides a structured framework for developing intelligent, secure, and trustworthy fraud detection systems in financial institutions and serves as a roadmap for researchers and practitioners aiming to address evolving fraud threats in cloud-based, distributed, and privacy-sensitive environments.

Abstract

Financial fraud detection remains a critical challenge in digital ecosystems. This survey presents a comprehensive review of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven fraud detection techniques from 2015 to 2025, analyzing over 60 key studies. The evolution is traced across three phases: Early stage (classical machine learning (ML)), rule-based systems, data imbalance), algorithmic growth (deep learning (DL)), temporal analysis, hybrid models), and smart innovation (graph neural networks (GNNs)), federated learning (FL), explainable AI (XAI)). Major challenges include severe data imbalance, dynamic fraud patterns, black-box interpretability, privacy preservation, and adversarial robustness. Emerging techniques such as GNNs, FL, and reinforcement learning (RL) have shown superior performance in detecting organized and real-time fraud. Six future directions are proposed: Multimodal data fusion, continual learning (CL), large language models (LLMs) for textual anomaly detection, blockchain integration, human-in-the-loop explainable systems, and standardized evaluation benchmarks. This review provides a structured framework for developing intelligent, secure, and trustworthy fraud detection systems in financial institutions. It serves as a roadmap for researchers and practitioners aiming to address evolving fraud threats in cloud-based, distributed, and privacy-sensitive environments. Received: 14 November 2025 | Revised: 9 February 2026 | Accepted: 7 June 2026   Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in the UCI Machine Learning Repository at https://archive.ics.uci.edu/.   Author Contribution Statement Elham Shamsinejad: Formal analysis, Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing. Hamid Banirostam: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access 2026

Artificial Intelligence in Financial Fraud Detection: Current Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions

The review highlights the transformative potential of AI while emphasizing the need for ethical, transparent, and secure implementation strategies to maximize effectiveness in combating increasingly sophisticated financial fraud schemes.

G. Onyarin · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Deep Learning Framework for Financial Fraud Detection: Systematic Feature Engineering and Comparative Evaluation of Neural Architectures

Financial fraud detection presents a significant challenge due to the extreme class imbalance inherent in transaction datasets. This paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of deep learning architectures for fraud detection in structured transaction data, with a focus on model performance, interpretability, and operational relevance. Specifically, we compare three deep tabular models, namely, an advanced multilayer perceptron (AdvancedMLP), an attention‐based residual network (AttentionFraudNet), and an advanced residual network (AdvancedResNet), against three traditional machine learning baselines, including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Logistic Regression. The experiments are conducted on the BankSim Simulator dataset, comprising 594,643 transactions with a fraud rate of approximately 1.21%. We evaluate models using multiple metrics, including PR‐AUC, ROC‐AUC, recall at low false positive rates, and precision at various operating thresholds. Our results show that AdvancedMLP achieves the highest PR‐AUC (0.8921 ± 0.0020), while Gradient Boosting attains the best ROC‐AUC (0.9987 ± 0.0001) and the highest recall at 1% FPR (0.9498 ± 0.0087). AttentionFraudNet provides interpretable attention weights that highlight transaction‐level features contributing to fraud predictions, enabling fraud analysts to understand and validate model decisions. Business impact analysis reveals that the proposed models can reduce fraud losses while maintaining false positive rates below 1%, translating to estimated annual savings of approximately 49.2 M$ for a mid‐sized financial institution. All models achieve inference times below 1 ms per transaction on an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU, demonstrating computational feasibility for near‐real‐time screening. Our findings highlight the effectiveness of deep tabular models for fraud detection and provide practical guidance for selecting models based on operational requirements and performance trade‐offs.

Vahid Azarvand, Parvin Azhdari, A. Beitollahi · 0 citations
Open access 2020

AI-Powered Fraud Prevention Systems in Financial Services

It is concluded that AI is a critical component of modern financial security infrastructure and will play an increasingly important role in combating financial fraud.

E. Harris · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

AI-Powered Fraud Detection in Banking: A Big Data Analytics Perspective

Analysis indicates that ensemble models incorporating XGBoost with LSTM networks achieve accuracy exceeding 98% with substantially reduced false positive rates, and critical challenges including model interpretability, data privacy, and deployment scalability are examined.

Kapil Sharma · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

Enhancing Fraud Detection with Hybrid Machine Learning Models

Experimental findings show that hybrid models are much more effective than standalone classifiers with respect to precision, recall, F 1 -score and area under the ROC curve (AUC) particularly in detecting rare and unseen cases of frauds.

M. Mohammed · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.