Skip to content
Open access

Experimental Modeling and Low-Order Control of a Multi-Actuator Adaptive Optics System

2026 · IEEE Access · Vol 14, pp. 143419-143439 · 0 citations · 69 references

Abstract

This paper develops a fixed-order <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H_{\infty }$ </tex-math></inline-formula> suboptimal controller for an experimental adaptive optics (AO) system used for real-time wavefront correction. The system contains a 40-actuator deformable mirror (DM40) used to emulate atmospheric-turbulence-induced wavefront disturbances, a 140-actuator deformable mirror (DM140) used as the correcting element, and two Shack–Hartmann wavefront sensors (SH-WFSs): one for observing the generated turbulence-like wavefront and the other for measuring the corrected residual wavefront. Both static and dynamic models are derived from experimental input-output data collected from the real AO bench; the static influence matrix is obtained using Hadamard-based excitation patterns, whereas the dynamic state-space models are identified using the PBSIDopt implementation of predictor-based subspace identification. The identified models have orders 21 and 7 for the DM140 and DM40 subsystems, respectively, giving a 28th-order AO model before controller synthesis. Since conventional full-order <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H_{\infty }$ </tex-math></inline-formula> synthesis may produce controllers with an order comparable to that of the identified AO plant, direct implementation can be challenging for real-time multi-actuator AO systems. Therefore, a low-order <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$H_{\infty }$ </tex-math></inline-formula> controller is synthesized in this study. The experimental results show that the third-order controller improves the residual wavefront response compared with the open-loop case under dominant Zernike disturbances, including defocus, astigmatism, coma, and trefoil components, while also revealing implementation challenges related to actuator saturation, asymmetric constraints, calibration errors, and unmodeled nonlinear dynamics.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.