Skip to content

ASFC-Net: An Enhanced YOLOv8 for Heavy-Haul Rail Surface Defect Inspection via Asymmetric Spatial–Frequency Collaboration

2026 · IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · Vol 75, pp. 5019512-5019512 · 0 citations · 32 references

Abstract

Weak rail-surface defects are difficult to detect because their localized evidence can be attenuated during downsampling and confused with structured rail texture. Across 2895 training and validation images, the low-, mid-, and high-frequency bands contain 97.23 %, 2.04 %, and 0.73 % of the whole-image spectral energy, respectively. This statistic characterizes global spectral imbalance but does not isolate defect-specific energy. We propose the asymmetric spatial–frequency collaborative network (ASFC-Net), a YOLOv8m-based detector that assigns different frequency-processing roles to P3 and P4. The low-loss semantic-guided high-frequency (LSGH) branch reconstructs localized frequency responses before further downsampling. Spatial–frequency centering alignment (SFCA) aligns centered spatial and frequency descriptors, while frequency-domain distribution-aware refinement (FDAR) combines learnable band priors with sample-dependent correction. Across five paired seeds, ASFC-Net achieves 60.38 % $\pm ~0.36$ % mAP@0.5 and 58.99 % $\pm ~0.49$ % recall, improving YOLOv8m by 0.99 and 1.11 percentage points, respectively; gap AP@0.5 improves by 2.23 points. The model uses 23.3-M parameters and 70.6 GFLOPs. The gains are concentrated at IoU 0.5: mean mAP@0.5:0.95 remains nearly unchanged, and batch-1 FP32 latency is higher despite the lower arithmetic complexity. These results support stage-asymmetric spatial–frequency processing for weak-defect detection while identifying remaining localization and runtime tradeoffs.

View source

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.