Skip to content
Review Open access

Randomised treatment of acute pancreatitis with infliximab: protocol for a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre, adaptive, phase 2 superiority trial (RAPID-I)

Sep 2026 · BMJ Open · Vol 16, pp. e118729 · 0 citations · 97 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and mechanism of action of the anti-TNF antibody infliximab in patients with AP is tested and potential safety signals will be adverse events related to infliximab.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an increasingly common cause of substantial morbidity and risk of mortality without licensed specific drug therapy. Because tumour necrosis factor α (TNF-α) contributes to AP, anti-TNF therapy may improve outcome from AP. This trial aims to test the efficacy, safety, cost-effectiveness and mechanism of action of the anti-TNF antibody infliximab in patients with AP. Methods and analysis Randomised treatment of Acute Pancreatitis with Infliximab: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial (RAPID-I) is a phase 2b trial designed to randomise 240 patients with AP to receive a single 5 mg/kg or 10 mg/kg infliximab or placebo infusion in a 1:1:1 ratio, initiated within 36 hours of hospital admission. The primary outcome is mean serum C-reactive protein (CRP) on trial days 2, 4 (±1 day) and 14 (±2 days) summated as area under the curve (AUC), with 25% reduction in either active arm compared with placebo considered clinically meaningful. Secondary outcomes include cumulative pain scores, opiate requirements, nutritional deficit (days without solid food), decline in serum albumin (negative AUC), rise in neutrophils (AUC), cumulative selective serial organ failure assessment (SOFA-2) scores, local pancreatic injury on contrast-enhanced CT scan (CECT day 14±7 days), infections, length of stay, mortality and patient reported outcome on days 4 (±1 day), 14 (±2 days) and 90 (±7 days). Cost-effectiveness will be based on costs and quality-adjusted life years over 90 (±7) days. Potential safety signals will be adverse events related to infliximab. Transcriptomic, cytokine and leucocyte profiles will be assessed at baseline and the same time points as CRP. Two adaptive interim analyses are planned. Ethics and dissemination The protocol has received Research Ethics Committee approval (South Central – Oxford C Research Ethics Committee 18/SC/0262). The findings will be disseminated through peer reviewed publication, national and international conferences and meetings. Trial registration number NCT03684278.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Proof-of-concept phase II study protocol to evaluate the efficacy and safety of prednisone in the treatment of idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity and its mechanistic pathways through an integrative analysis: the DILICORT clinical trial

Idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is an unpredictable adverse reaction ranging from mild liver enzyme elevations to acute liver failure, with management largely limited to withdrawal of the causative drug. An international propensity score-matched study of 724 DILI cases associated corticosteroid thera...

Vanesa Garrido-Rodríguez, Á. Remesal-Doblado, Miren García-Cortés et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A multicenter randomized, double-blinded placebo-controlled phase 2 trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of ilofotase alfa in patients at risk for kidney injury following open heart surgery.

Administration of ilofotase alfa did not attenuate short- and longer-term renal function loss in patients at a high risk of renal functional impairment after on-pump cardiac surgery.

Louis Mourisse, M. Ostermann, Steven Thiessen et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Impact of non-enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (NEPERT) on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.

BACKGROUND Pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) is multifactorial. Efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) for pain remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of non-enteric-coated PERT (NEPERT) on pain in CP. DESIGN In this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial, we enroll...

R. Talukdar, Abdul Rasheed, M. Unnisa et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel Group Study of Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Therapy in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19.

BACKGROUND Alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) reduces production of several pro-inflammatory cytokines. Increased inflammatory cytokines are prominent in the hyperinflammatory state associated with severe COVID-19 infection. The study objective was to determine if administration of AAT reduced the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia...

Luis Puente Maestu, Myriam Calle Rubio, Silvia Martin Bote et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Dual therapy with tofacitinib and steroids for acute severe ulcerative colitis: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND One-third of patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) fail intravenous corticosteroids. We evaluated whether adding tofacitinib to corticosteroids reduces treatment failure in ASUC. METHODS In this single-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, adults with ASUC were randomized 1:1 to to...

U. Arora, M. Verma, D. Madan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Protocol and rationale for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial of admilparant (BMS-986278), an oral lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 antagonist, in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: ALOFT-IPF

Abstract Introduction Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is associated with progressive loss of lung function and poor prognosis. There remains a need for novel therapies for patients with IPF. Admilparant, an oral lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1 antagonist, slowed lung function decline and was well tolerated in a ph...

Toby M. Maher, Fernando J. Martinez, M. Kreuter et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.