Skip to content
Open access

A retrospective epidemiological study of screening-derived solid cancer incidence proxy rates in South Korea before and after COVID-19 using Korean National Health Insurance Service data

Oct 2026 · PLoS ONE · Vol 21, pp. e0360040 · 0 citations · 10 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Aggregate South Korean national screening data show pandemic-era temporal associations with heterogeneous changes in selected solid cancer program proxy rates, which support an indirect screening-disruption and ascertainment interpretation rather than causal proof of a direct COVID-19 effect on solid cancer incidence.

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted cancer screening and diagnostic pathways globally. Aggregate screening-derived indicators require cautious interpretation because they do not represent confirmed cancer registry incidence but might reflect program participation, referral patterns, and denominator composition. Objective To evaluate pre- and post-COVID-19 changes in selected solid cancer screening-derived incidence proxy rates in South Korea, and to estimate model-based proxy rates through 2028. Methods This retrospective ecological longitudinal study analyzed publicly available aggregate annual cancer-screening statistics from the Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) and Korean Statistical Information Service (KOSIS) for six solid cancer programs (stomach, liver, colorectal, breast, cervical, and lung cancer). Annual proxy rates per 100,000 screened or eligible persons were calculated. Pre-COVID (2010–2019) and post-COVID (2020–2024) means were compared using Welch t-tests with Mann–Whitney U sensitivity analyses. Ordinary least-squares (OLS) forecasts were generated for 2025–2028. Interrupted time-series analysis was not feasible owing to an insufficient post-COVID observation window. Results Post-COVID changes in proxy rates were heterogeneous across selected programs. Breast cancer proxy rates increased by 17.1% (Welch p = 0.002) and liver cancer proxy rates by 83.6% (Welch p = 0.002); the liver cancer increase reflects denominator restriction to a high-risk population rather than a true epidemiological surge. Stomach cancer decreased by 23.3% (Welch p = 0.001), cervical cancer by 56.9% (Welch p = 0.005), and colorectal cancer by 25.8% (Welch p = 0.007). Lung cancer data were available only from 2019 to 2024 (program inception) and were interpreted descriptively. Conclusions Aggregate South Korean national screening data show pandemic-era temporal associations with heterogeneous changes in selected solid cancer program proxy rates. These findings support an indirect screening-disruption and ascertainment interpretation rather than causal proof of a direct COVID-19 effect on solid cancer incidence.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Baseline prevalence of lung cancer screening and associated factors among women in breast cancer screening clinics prior to the Pink & Pearl program: A retrospective analysis of electronic health records

The need for strategies to improve smoking history documentation and promote tobacco cessation efforts in cancer screening programs is highlighted and the Pink & Pearl program, a co-located breast and lung cancer screening initiative at these sites, will be evaluated.

B. Odeny, Sri Gopalsamy Ramaswamy, Benjamin Bowe et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Cancer incidence and mortality among adults with disabilities in Korea: A 15-year study

Abstract Background Despite precision medicine’s growth, 15% of the global population with disabilities remains in a “clinical blind spot.” While previous research focused on fragmented metrics, this study investigates the “Incidence Paradox”—where lower adjusted cancer incidence masks systemic healthcare exclusion—to...

U. Lee, S. Kim, B. Park et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Risk of severe COVID-19 outcomes in individuals with prior cancer diagnosis - A nationwide Swedish register-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND Individuals with cancer are recognized as a high-risk group for severe COVID-19, yet population-based evidence across cancer types remains limited. This study assessed associations between previous cancer diagnoses and COVID-19 outcomes among individuals diagnosed with different cancers. METHODS We include...

Patricia Ernst, Niranjan Ganeshkumar, A. Santosa et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Thyroid Cancer Incidence Trends and Epidemiological Patterns in Saudi Arabia: A Retrospective Analysis of National Cancer Registry Data (2013–2022)

A BSTRACT Thyroid cancer is the most rapidly increasing malignancy worldwide, with ionizing radiation recognized as its most established modifiable risk factor. Saudi Arabia has reported rising thyroid cancer incidence over recent decades, yet comprehensive national trend analyses remain limited. The o...

A. Almohammadi · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Estimating county-level lung cancer screening prevalence using linked claims and multi-source data.

The SCALE framework enables county-level estimation of lung cancer screening prevalence based on synthesis of publicly available but incomplete smoking data and suggests that the SCALE framework can support small area lung cancer screening surveillance even when granular smoking history data are unavailable.

J. Lund, Bradford E. Jackson, C. Baggett et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Cancer survivorship and guideline-concordant screening: Assessment of gaps in colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening despite increased healthcare contact (BRFSS 2024).

Survivors were more likely to be up-to-date with CRC and cervical cancer screening but not mammography, and Absolute rates remained below national targets, suggesting increased healthcare contact alone is insufficient.

María Felix Torres-Nolasco, C. Otiniano Alvarado · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.