It is argued that biodiversity is often treated as an environmental co-benefit rather than as a foundational determinant of health, which weakens the implementation of One Health approaches and means that future health and sustainability policies should move beyond generic references to health and explicitly recognize biodiversity as part of preventive health systems.
Abstract
Health has become a central term in global sustainability policy, yet it is often used without sufficient conceptual precision. Public health, global health, One Health, EcoHealth, GeoHealth, and Planetary Health each emphasize different dimensions of the relationship between humans, animals, and the environment. In policy contexts, however, these distinctions are frequently blurred. We argue that biodiversity is often treated as an environmental co-benefit rather than as a foundational determinant of health. This weakens the implementation of One Health approaches because biodiversity underpins disease regulation, immune system development, food and water security, ecosystem functioning, resilience, and climate adaptation. At the same time, biodiversity provides a critical link between One Health and broader Planetary Health challenges, including global environmental change and the transgression of planetary boundaries. Future health and sustainability policies should move beyond generic references to health and explicitly recognize biodiversity as part of preventive health systems.
A growing number of jurisdictions have granted rights to nature. Scholarship on these frameworks has been mainly legal and philosophical and has rarely asked whether legal recognition improves the condition of ecosystems. This paper takes up that question from a planetary health perspective, which treats ecosystem heal...
Pim Martens, Valesca S. M. Venhof, Marrit van der Meer et al.· Challenges· 0 citations
Abstract Our societies face a polycrisis in which climate change — with its devastating environmental and health impacts — demands immediate attention. The public health community must respond as scientists, professionals and citizens to the profound question of what future we are building for generations to come. Th...
M. Codd, C. Cadeddu· European Journal of Public H...· 0 citations
One Health has been highly effective at emphasizing the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health. However, One Health must more explicitly incorporate ecological theory to move beyond documenting pathogen presence or co-location toward understanding the mechanisms that lead to infection and transmi...
Andrew W Bartlow, Jeanne M. Fair· One Health· 0 citations
Abstract Issue seven of the nine planetary boundaries have already been transgressed. The 2026 Lancet Countdown confirms that current efforts are insufficient and reversing previous gains, with 12 of 20 health-climate indicators at record levels. Net-zero strategies in healthcare cannot restore the ecological condition...
D. Zjalic, Yin-Yue Wu, D. Wilkinson et al.· European Journal of Public H...· 0 citations
Climate change and environmental degradation affect not only ecosystems and physical health but also psychological well-being. Eco-anxiety—defined as chronic or anticipatory distress related to perceived environmental decline—has emerged as a growing public mental health concern. Although One Health frameworks recognis...
Saifullahi Idris Umar, Sadiq Muhammad Maaji, Ibrahim Isma'il Beli et al.· One Health· 0 citations
Climate change and Anthropocene pressures accelerate soil degradation, threatening agricultural productivity, ecosystems, and human health. Within the One Health framework, soils are critical living systems. However, while physical and chemical dimensions of soil health are well studied, the biological dimension—...
S. Timmusk, Erik Ribeli, Lawrence Behers et al.· Plant and Soil· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.