Jul 2026· Clinical Advances in Periodontics· Vol 16, pp. 477 - 484· 0 citations· 38 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A 10‐year follow‐up of a patient treated with reconstructive surgery for peri‐implantitis and enrolled in a structured maintenance program suggests that a regenerative surgical approach, combined with structured maintenance care, can help obtain disease resolution and maintain stable long‐term outcomes.
Abstract
Abstract Background Peri‐implantitis poses a significant challenge to implant longevity, leading to progressive bone loss and potential implant failure. While reconstructive surgery has been proven effective in regenerating peri‐implant tissues, the long‐term stability of the regenerated tissues and the impact of supportive peri‐implant care (SPIC) on bone levels remains underexplored. This case study presents a 10‐year follow‐up of a patient treated with reconstructive surgery for peri‐implantitis and enrolled in a structured maintenance program. Methods A 68‐year‐old male with a failing implant in the mandibular right first molar was treated using a reconstructive approach involving surface decontamination, particulate bone grafts, and an acellular dermal matrix as a barrier. Three re‐entry procedures were performed over a 10‐year period: at 9 months for the second stage of the two‐step GBR procedure and at 8 and 10 years for implant placement to replace fractured teeth. These interventions allowed for direct clinical and radiographic assessment of bone‐level changes. Results At 9 months, bone regeneration was observed with minor residual dehiscences. After 8 years, bone remodeling and crestal bone gain on the lingual aspect were noted in the absence of further surgical interventions. At 10 years, radiographic evaluations confirmed minimal changes in marginal bone levels. Conclusions The presented two‐stage regenerative approach successfully restored peri‐implant health and function over time while minimizing the patient's financial burden. The three re‐entry procedures provided direct clinical evidence of bone regeneration and demonstrated the positive impact of effective maintenance therapy on marginal bone levels and their long‐term stability. Key points The described regenerative treatment for peri‐implantitis may ensure long‐term satisfactory outcomes. Supportive peri‐implant care (SPIC) is effective in preventing disease recurrence and may improve crestal bone levels over time. Plain language summary This study presents the case of a 68‐year‐old patient with a failing dental implant due to peri‐implantitis. The implant was treated by thoroughly cleaning its surface, placing bone grafts, and using a protective membrane to regenerate bone around the fixture and obtain disease resolution. The patient returned for three follow‐up surgeries over 10 years, providing a unique opportunity to directly examine bone stability around the implant. Direct observations revealed that the bone graft healed well within the first 9 months, and the regenerated peri‐implant bone remained stable with minimal changes for a decade. Regular check‐ups and cleanings also helped prevent disease recurrence and further bone loss. By saving the existing implant, the patient avoided the extra expenses of removing and replacing it. Overall, these results suggest that a regenerative surgical approach, combined with structured maintenance care, can help obtain disease resolution and maintain stable long‐term outcomes. This can improve comfort and function while reducing costs for patients.
Peri-implantitis therapy aims at overcoming peri-implant inflammation and preventing further marginal bone loss; however, the achievement of stable reconstructive outcomes remains challenging in non-contained defects. This retrospective study evaluated the 5-year effectiveness of reconstructive surgical protocol using...
G. Lombardo, Miriana Gualtieri, Guido Lobbia et al.· Journal of cranio-maxillo-fa...· 0 citations
Background and Clinical Significance: Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory condition associated, among other factors, with biofilm accumulation, affecting peri-implant soft and hard tissues and potentially leading to implant loss. Its treatment remains challenging because no single decontamination or regenerative protoc...
Jakub Kwiatek, O. Barczak, Marcin Lenkowski et al.· Reports· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Aim To characterize longitudinal changes in peri‐implant soft tissue phenotype following surgical therapy of peri‐implantitis. Materials and Methods Twenty‐one patients with superimposable intraoral scan datasets at four timepoints—pre‐operative (T0), intra‐operative (T1), 3‐month (T2), and 12‐month (T3) follo...
H. Choi, Seung-Hyun Park, Seulbin Im et al.· Clinical Implant Dentistry a...· 0 citations
The timing of dental implant placement – whether immediate after tooth extraction or delayed after a healing period – remains debatable. Immediate implant placement offers the advantage of reducing overall treatment time and preserving soft-tissue contours. Still, it may carry a higher risk of marginal bone loss...
Chetan Chandra, Anil Kumar Jha, S. Chandra et al.· Advances in Human Biology· 0 citations
ABSTRACT Introduction To compare the clinical, radiographic, and patient‐reported outcomes of submerged and non‐submerged healing modalities in the reconstructive surgical treatment of peri‐implantitis, and to evaluate factors associated with treatment success. Materials and Methods Patient records from individuals tre...
S. Isler, Kaan Tekbudak, F. Soysal et al.· Clinical Implant Dentistry a...· 0 citations
Implant rehabilitation in the posterior maxilla with severe vertical bone atrophy remains clinically challenging, particularly when bone augmentation procedures are not feasible or are refused by the patient. The use of ultrashort implants combined with dynamic navigation has been proposed as a minimally invasive alter...
Gerardo Pellegrino, Fabio Rossi, A. Oliverio et al.· Case Reports in Dentistry· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.