Jul 2026· Critical reviews in oncology/hematology· Vol 225, pp.
105485
· 0 citations· 97 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A clinically oriented synthesis of strategies to improve CAR-T efficacy in DLBCL, focusing on two interconnected objectives: enhancing initial remission and sustaining long-term disease control, is provided.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has transformed the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), yet a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve durable remission. These limitations arise from both inadequate initial response and subsequent disease relapse. Despite the availability of multiple optimization strategies, their clinical implementation remains challenging, partly because these approaches act at different points along the therapeutic continuum and address distinct biological or clinical barriers, resulting in a fragmented clinical implementation landscape that lacks a unified framework. In this review, we provide a clinically oriented synthesis of strategies to improve CAR-T efficacy in DLBCL, focusing on two interconnected objectives: enhancing initial remission and sustaining long-term disease control. We discuss how interventions before leukapheresis, during manufacturing, before infusion, during in vivo expansion, and after remission may shape clinical outcomes. We also discuss in vivo CAR-T technologies as an emerging platform with the potential to expand the therapeutic landscape and improve accessibility. By integrating evidence across studies, this review provides a comprehensive and systematic perspective on optimizing CAR-T efficacy in DLBCL while highlighting current evidence gaps and challenges to clinical implementation.
The determinants of response and relapse, as well as the mechanisms of antigen-positive and antigen-negative escape that next-generation approaches aim to overcome are discussed, all with the goal of extending durable remissions to every patient.
Current evidence remains largely preliminary and is limited by the paucity of randomized prospective trials, although relapse management is disease-specific and increasingly incorporates novel therapeutic agents, including bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) and other targeted therapies.
Martina Canichella, E. Abruzzese, Mariagiovanna Cefalo et al.· Cells· 0 citations
Clinical management of R/R LBCL becomes highly complex in peculiar settings, especially in case of multiple relapses even after CAR T-cell therapy, as described in the clinical case of secondary central nervous system disease relapse.
Enrico Amaducci, M. Clerico, Davide Camoirano et al.· Frontiers in Oncology· 0 citations
A clinically oriented synthesis of the current evidence on relapse or progression after CAR-T cell therapy in LBCL is provided, focusing on relapse patterns, underlying biological mechanisms, risk factors, and evolving salvage strategies.
Ling-Zhi Wang, Qing Li, Xiao-Jian Zhu· Cancer Treatment and Researc...· 0 citations
Current challenges in solid tumour treatment are examined through evidence from clinical trials, highlighting key obstacles such as antigen heterogeneity, the immunosuppressive tumour microenvironment, poor cellular trafficking, and treatment-related failures that have informed the development of next-generation CAR co...
A. Justiz-Vaillant, Sachin Soodeen, Rodolfo Arozarena-Fundora et al.· Frontiers in Molecular Medic...· 3 citations
It is proposed that the future of DLBCL management lies not merely in the availability of novel agents, but in the rational sequencing and combination of these modalities based on dynamic molecular monitoring and individualized risk assessment—translating molecular insights into actionable clinical pathways.
B. Guo, Hai-Ke Lei, Yao Liu· World Journal of Clinical On...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.