The ASCE/SEI 7‐16 standard contains prescriptive provisions for soil–structure interaction (SSI). However, SSI is rarely incorporated into nonlinear response history analyses, particularly in performance‐based seismic design. This paper examines the seismic response of the $4.3 billion University of California, San Francisco Health Helen Diller Hospital Building, explicitly considering SSI effects. The 258‐foot‐tall structure comprises 15 aboveground levels and two basement levels and is supported by a pile foundation system embedded in complex soil conditions. Due to its proximity to the San Andreas Fault, the design incorporates a series of viscous dampers within a structural steel special moment frame system to enhance seismic performance. This paper extends beyond the SSI requirements of the project. The study employs a parametric approach starting with a fixed‐base model as benchmark and then progressively refining the representation of the soil and massive foundation system with springs and dashpots. The study focuses on how the representation of SSI affects the design demands of the different elements in the foundation and basement, even when forces above ground remain mostly unaltered. Additionally, results demonstrate the important dynamic higher mode effects of a massive and large footprint pile foundation. The higher modes associated with SSI resulted in significant inertia forces of the basement and the foundation even for small lateral deformations. The response above ground indicates that while interstory drift remains largely unaffected, SSI significantly influences floor accelerations. Finally, the effect of different sources of energy dissipation associated with SSI such as the hysteretic behavior and the radiation damping of the pile foundations, the soil passive pressure of the retaining walls, as well as the friction between the soil and the slabs on grade are explicitly studied.
This paper evaluates the influence of soil–structure interaction (SSI) on the seismic performance of a 25‐story reinforced concrete core wall building designed under performance‐based seismic design (PBSD) guidelines. A high‐fidelity three‐dimensional nonlinear finite element model was developed in OpenSees to captur...
K. Kolozvari, R. Kadota, Andrés Reyes et al.· Earthquake spectra· 0 citations
Masonry infill walls are widely used in reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, but their seismic behavior is often studied using fixed-base models without fully considering soil–structure interaction. This study investigates the seismic response of a ten-story, one-bay RC frame with 0%, 30%, and 50% infill openings, with...
B. Shilpa, G. Narayana, B. Narendra· Research on Engineering Stru...· 0 citations
Soil–structure interaction (SSI) plays a decisive role in the settlement behavior of shallow foundations, where soil stiffness, structural stiffness, and load application interact in a coupled manner. While traditional SSI concepts such as the system stiffness method provide robust results for many standard cases, they...
Christian Wallner, F. Tschuchnigg, D. Schlicke· Buildings· 0 citations
Geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls are widely used in seismic regions due to their flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and favorable deformation characteristics. However, the influence of fascia type on their seismic response is not yet fully understood. This study presents a comprehensive numerical investigation of...
Mihretab Madamo, Ritik Rathore, Arindam Dey· E3S Web of Conferences· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.