Skip to content

Abstract B047: Pancreatic cancer model for drug development and personalized treatment: Progress of the Tumor Model and Drug Development Core (TMDDC) of CaRE2

Oct 2026 · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · Vol 35, pp. B047-B047 · 0 citations

TL;DR

This study measured host and tumor circulating cfDNA in mice bearing human pancreatic cancer cell xenografts, showing that cfDNA increases shortly after radiation (IR) or gemcitabine treatment and shows promise as a model to identify treatment regimens with greater therapeutic gain.

Abstract

Challenges with studies of patient-derived xenografts (PDX) to screen best agents for treatment include the prolonged growth time and the long follow-up for evaluation of tumor response. A liquid biopsy assay that might within days evaluate tumor response could revolutionize selection of cancer treatment regimens. Personalized therapy would overcome disparities, genetic and ethnic, that impact patients. We have developed a bead-based branched-DNA assay with the needed accuracy and precision to detect and quantify cfDNA. The assay is available as a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-ready kit to measure both tumor and host cell kill. In this study, we measured host and tumor circulating cfDNA in mice bearing human pancreatic cancer cell xenografts, showing that cfDNA increases shortly after radiation (IR) or gemcitabine treatment. The assay successfully compared gemcitabine to an acetyl gemcitabine developed in the Agyare Lab. NSG mice were subcutaneously implanted with either PANC1 or BxPc3 human pancreatic cancer cells. When tumor volume reached 1000 mm3, mice received either 12 Gy total body radiation (TBI), or Gemcitabine (GEM) or acetyl-GEM at 150 mg/kg BW. Blood samples were collected prior to treatment and early time points post-treatment. Plasma murine (host) and human (tumor) cfDNA concentrations were based on the measurement of the B1 (murine) or Alu (human) retrotransposon sequences in the cfDNA using the QuantiDNA RadTox cfDNA Test Kits (Diacarta, Inc., CA, USA). Both host (B1) and tumor (Alu) cfDNA increased after treatment with radiation or GEM/acetyl-GEM. A greater increase in B1 after IR indicates more host cell damage, compared to GEM in both cell lines. Perhaps unexpectedly, there was enhanced tumor response to a second dose of GEM when given 4 days after the first dose as demonstrated by the greater Alu cfDNA concentrations. The acetyl-GEM derivative had a similar tumor response but lower toxicity than GEM suggesting an improved therapeutic gain. QuantiDNA tests for host and tumor cfDNA provided a quantitative method to evaluate tumor response in a murine xenograft model. Testing for B1 allowed us to monitor murine host toxicity. Testing for Alu allowed the discovery of a two-hit mechanism for GEM response. Both IR and GEM, common treatments for pancreatic cancer, resulted in increased circulating human Alu cfDNA within hours of treatment. Therefore, this test shows promise as a model to identify treatment regimens with greater therapeutic gain. Paul Okunieff, Steven G. Swarts, Lori Rice, Hernan Flores-Rozas, Steven B. Zhang, Zhenhuan Zhang, Christine Jarosik, Edward Agyare. Pancreatic cancer model for drug development and personalized treatment: Progress of the Tumor Model and Drug Development Core (TMDDC) of CaRE2 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 19th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities; 2026 Oct 18-21; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2026;35(10 Suppl):Abstract nr B047.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

Abstract B042: Pharmacophenotypic analysis of advanced pancreatic cancer patient-derived tumoroid models uncovers spatiotemporal drug resistance dynamics associated with single-agent and combination therapies

Despite decades of intensive research, pancreatic cancer remains one of the deadliest malignancies, with only modest improvements in patient survival. Recently, important clinical breakthroughs have been achieved with inhibitors targeting the active RAS(ON) state, doubling the median overall survival of patients...

J. Bruun, P. Eide, Christer A. Andreassen et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Abstract B053: RAS(ON) inhibition, but not chemotherapy, sensitizes RAS mutant PDAC to immunotherapy via tumor microenvironment remodeling in preclinical models

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains largely refractory to immune checkpoint blockade and combining anti-PD-(L)1 therapy with standard-of-care chemotherapy has not improved clinical outcomes over chemotherapy alone. Because oncogenic RAS drives both tumor growth and tumor-intrinsic immune suppression, we h...

L. Grigoryan, Keith Macaraig, Victor Batiste et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Development and characterization of a doxorubicin-resistant triple-negative breast cancer spheroid model for drug screening purposes.

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most fatal subtype of breast cancer. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and immune therapy remain the only available therapeutic strategies for treatment, but unfortunately, patients frequently develop drug-resistance. Drug resistance towards chemotherapeutic agents is a major obstacle f...

Viwe Fokazi, B. Abrahams, M. Sekhoacha et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Abstract B071: Preclinical Evaluation of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) Applied with KRAS Inhibitors in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Models

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains among the most lethal malignancies, with limited survival despite advances in systemic therapy. Activating KRAS mutations, present in approximately 90% of PDACs, contribute to tumor progression in part through regulation of c-Myc. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therap...

H. Fishman, Y. E. Mutlak, L. Lifshitz et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Abstract A070: Clinical application of functional precision medicine for pancreatic cancer enables personalized treatment prioritization and identification of RAS-targeted combinations

The successful clinical implementation of Optim.AI™ for pancreatic cancer within a CAP/CLIA laboratory is demonstrated, providing actionable treatment recommendations within seven business days and high concordance with observed clinical resistance supports its potential to improve treatment selection.

Edward Kai-Hua. Chow, Masturah Mohamed Abdul Rashid, Lydia Ogrodzinski et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.