Aug 2026· Journal of Biomedical Informatics· pp.
105089
· 0 citations· 39 references
MedicineComputer Science
TL;DR
Initial experiments on heart-failure-focused clinical question answering show that CGX improves evidence retrieval quality and perceived answer reliability over conventional retrieval methods, while reducing total graph construction time by 69.7% under the same input corpus and hardware setting.
Abstract
Knowledge graphs are increasingly used to organize and retrieve complex medical information, yet existing graph-based retrieval systems often suffer from high construction costs, limited scalability as knowledge grows, and limited interpretability in clinical practice. These challenges are amplified in cardiovascular medicine, where data are heterogeneous, noisy, and linked by complex relationships. In this work, we present CGX, a domain-oriented GraphRAG framework that mirrors clinical reasoning for explainable heart failure analysis. CGX structures cardiovascular knowledge into a three-layer hierarchy that spans patient-level observations, guideline-based evidence, and standardized ontologies. An OCR-enhanced preprocessing pipeline combined with a zero-shot biomedical transformer converts PDF-based biomedical literature/guidelines and machine-readable clinical narratives into semantic triples, reducing error propagation compared with vanilla RAG. A Hybrid U-Retrieval mechanism then exploits the graph topology through top-down summary retrieval and bottom-up path refinement, producing explicit evidence chains that support each answer. Initial experiments on heart-failure-focused clinical question answering show that CGX improves evidence retrieval quality and perceived answer reliability over conventional retrieval methods, while reducing total graph construction time by 69.7% under the same input corpus and hardware setting. Under blinded expert clinical evaluation, CGX reduces the rate of clinically risky answers from 12.4%-14.0% to 8.3%, alongside substantially higher scores across all five expert-rated Likert criteria compared with both baselines. These results suggest that CGX offers a scalable and reusable GraphRAG architecture for integrating structured medical knowledge with large language models to support trustworthy clinical decision-making.
A clinical knowledge graph construction and refinement framework that combines multi-agent relation proposal, ontology-aware normalization, deterministic evidence scoring, and JEPA-based latent refinement is proposed.
Kushagra Yadav, N. Prabhath, A. Lamba et al.· 0 citations
A layered reliability framework is defined in which graph-based inference addresses knowledge incompleteness, retrieval-augmented prompt control mitigates instability, and ontology grounding reduces semantic ambiguity, providing a foundation for more reliable biomedical AI systems.
The results show that effective hierarchical Graph RAG depends not only on graph augmentation, but on constructing, navigating, and weighting the hierarchy, while retrieval quality remains sensitive to clustering and weighting choices.
Maneeha Rani, B. K. Mishra, Dhavalkumar Thakker et al.· Machine Learning: Science an...· 0 citations
A scalable, knowledge graph driven big data framework for explainable clinical decision support that unifies heterogeneous healthcare data into a semantically structured representation and provides transparent, traceable decision paths through knowledge graph reasoning addressing key challenges of interpretability and...
Ubaid Ul Rehman, Hufsa Mohsin, Ghulam Mustafa et al.· Journal of Big Data· 0 citations
KRAKEN (Knowledge Research & Analysis Kit for Evidence Networks) addresses this gap by integrating existing graphs with specialized sources such as RefMet, LIPID MAPS, NIH Common Data Elements, Polygenic Score Catalog, and derived wellness measures including biological age and biological BMI.
Amy K. Glen, D. Witherington, Trent Leslie et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.